SH4010QA Diversity in Health and Social Care SH4010QA Diversity In HSC Assignment Brief Name of assessment: Reflective Commentary

Short description: A 2000-word reflective commentary of a case-study simulation that took place in the seminar.

Weighting: 60%

Due date: 29/06/26 before 3pm

Formative feedback date: 25/05/26

Feedback release date: 4 weeks after the final submission date

Assessment Guidance You are required to write a 2000-word reflective commentary of a case-study simulation that took place in the seminar. A case study is a description of a real-life issue or situation that requires you to reflect on and analyse the main issues involved. The aim is to identify the issues and discuss them from your own point of view by relating these issues to academic literature on the topic, draw conclusions about why the issues occurred, and consider how best to respond to them.

A case study simulation is an opportunity to apply (use) theoretical knowledge from academic literature, as well as your own reflections, to real-life situations you may come across in health and social care professional contexts.

Writing a reflective commentary of a case study simulation enables you to:

Reflect on the details and complexities of issues in real-life situations. Apply (use) the knowledge gained from your academic reading of topics covered in the lectures and seminars. Discuss your experience of the case study simulation and draw conclusions for a professional response to it. Step 1: Before You Start Writing Your Reflective Commentary, You Need To: a)  Choose ONE Case study simulation to work on (** these will be presented in the Seminars)

b) identify and make a note of the main issues and challenges the case study presents.

c) identify and make a note of the main stakeholders (individuals, professionals, and/or groups who might have an interest in the case)

d) Go through your lecture and seminar notes, and your reflective journal, and identify the theories, concepts and academic literature you have covered and read about (or you will need to read about) on topics that relate to the main issues you have identified in the case study.

e) Read through the theories, concepts and academic literature to make sure you properly understand them and make notes of how you will use them to reflect on your experience of and discuss the main issues identified in the case study simulation.

Step 2: Writing Your Reflective Commentary Your reflective commentary should include all of the following 4 elements: introduction, description, reflective discussion and conclusion.

The suggested word count for each section below is only a suggestion; you can have more or less of the suggested word count for any of the sections, so long as the whole is up to 2000 words.

Introduction (150 – 200 words): begin by defining the main purpose of the case study simulation and briefly outline the overall problem in the case study that needs to be solved.

Description (200- 250 words): write a brief description of the case study by giving a summary of the main issues, challenges identified and the main stakeholders. Assume the reader knows nothing of the assessment task and provide enough information to give a context for your reflections and discussion.

Reflective discussion (1200 – 1400): discuss the main issues identified using information gained from your academic reading, and discuss your own reflections on your experience of the case study simulation.

Conclusion (250–350 words): summarise the conclusions you have come to and present recommendations for resolving the case (for each recommendation, you should also go further to provide a reason why you suggest each recommendation).

Reference List This is a reference list of all the academic and non-academic literature you have used in the reflective commentary.

A reference list is not a bibliography. A bibliography is a list of all you have read and all you have used. But the reference list is only a list of all you have used and cited in this work.

Use the Harvard Referencing Style to arrange your reference list.

• You are expected to reference readings studied on the module in your coursework.

Upload your coursework to the submission link by the due date of May 11 2026 by 3pm. in a Word file, as instructed.

Marking Criteria Rationale for this assessment method

This assessment is designed to evaluate the extent to which your work meets the following module learning outcomes (LOs):

1. Demonstrate knowledge of relevant legislations and policies, explaining their role in promoting equality, equity, diversity and inclusion in health and social care.
2. Consider the impact of stigmatisation, labelling, stereotyping and discrimination and discuss their implication for diverse identities and experiences in health and social care practice.
3. Reflect on personal values, attitudes and experiences, identifying how these influence professional practice and contribute to addressing inequalities and promoting inclusion.
4. Identify the professional role in promoting ethical and anti-oppressive practice and challenging inequalities

HSC706 Research Methods for Healthcare Professionals (K/650/4197) HSC706 Assignment Brief Qualification Level 7 Diploma in Health and Social Care [610/1483/7] Unit Code and Title HSC706: Research Methods for Healthcare Professionals Unit Reference Number K/650/4197 Credits 20 TQT 200 GLH 100 Assignment Aim The aim of this unit is to develop learners’ research skills to include understanding different research approaches, formulation of research proposals, planning research activity, analysing and interpreting data, and the relationship between research and evidence-based practice.

Learning Outcomes And Assessment Criteria Learning Outcomes When awarded credit for this unit, a learner will:

Assessment Criteria Assessment of this learning outcome will require a learner to demonstrate that they can:

1. Understand the relevance of research within health and social care contexts. 1.1 Justify the contribution of research to health and social care provision.
2. Understand research approaches in health and social care contexts. 2.1 Critically evaluate a range of research philosophies. 2.2 Examine different approaches to research.
3. Be able to plan a research proposal relevant to management of health and social care. 3.1 Justify the elements of a research proposal. 3.2 Design an appropriate research proposal.

3.3 Analyse the ethical aspects of research

4. Be able to analyse and interpret a  range of data. 4.1 Explain types and sources of research data. 4.2 Analyse data using appropriate approaches.

4.3 Draw conclusions from data collected.

5. Understand the relationship between research and evidencebased practice. 5.1 Analyse the relationship between research and evidence-based practice. 5.2 Evaluate an existing piece of research relevant to health and social care.

5.3 Analyse the contribution of research and evidence based practice to decision-making.

Part III Recommended Solution and Potential Implementation Issues

This section will consist of:

The Recommend a Solution to the problem, specifically what is the recommended solution for this organization and why, support by your weighted objective and the organization’s needs, Opportunities with justification for its selection, including the potential benefit. Training Strategies Implementation Potential Implementation Issues  What are areas of concern when planning out an implementation strategy? References/Bibliography and Appendices: (5 points)

This section documents the sources used in the research report. At least 10 citations from at least seven resources must be included in APA style. This attachment includes a copy of the strategic information systems grid you developed during your research (Attachment A), as well as the comparison of solutions you considered

SCM 610 – Supply Chain Collaboration

Assignment – Supply Chain Mapping

Learning Outcome

This assignment is designed to practice the tool of supply chain mapping and provide a first-hand experience with the complexity of supply chains.

Directions

Identify your FAVORITE PRODUCT – then using your personal knowledge and open-source media, create a supply chain map for that product.

The focus is on identifying inter-firm relations, visualizing the network complexity, and then determining the need to manage, monitor, or not monitor various links within the supply chain.

See Figure 11-1 in the textbook for a basic example of a supply chain map for a Manufacturer, Figure 11-2 for a Retailer, and Figure 11-3 for a Raw Material Supplier.

Your map will need to be more complex than these figures but must meet the requirements below.

Grading Criteria

Part A: Requirements for Map

1. Draw the map to fit on one page (8.5″ × 11″) with legible text.

• May be hand-drawn.
• Map must contain at least one raw material supplier (“dirt”) and at least one post-consumer customer (“dirt”).
• Align suppliers and customers into labeled tiers.

2. Clearly identify the focal firm by name and the product/product-line being analyzed.

3. Be sure to identify key suppliers/customers by name (others can have hypothetical names).

4. Highlight managed, monitored, and not-monitored links (using different line styles to differentiate).

5. Include non-members and their appropriate links (clearly differentiate them from members).

---

Part B: Requirements for Evaluation

1. Limited to one page (APA format not required).

2. Summarize the focal firm and product/product-line studied.

3. Briefly identify three issues of concern as seen on this supply chain map.

4. Recommend one potential improvement for each issue identified in #3.

LTE 54 Real-World HR Problem Solving Project Team size: 5 students (must be different nationalities and cultural background) Submission : April 15 2026 Output:

1. Written professional HR document (25–30 pages)
2. Executive presentation (10 pages – 20 minutes + Q&A)
3. Evidence appendix (mandatory)
4. Purpose of the Assignment This assignment is designed to help you work as junior HR consultants on a real HR management problem in a real organization. You will: • engage with HR professionals, • collect original data, • apply HR theories to real situations, • design feasible, evidence-based HR solutions. This assignment cannot be completed successfully using AI tools alone. Real-world engagement and evidence are mandatory.
5. Teamwork Requirements • Teams consist of 5 students (different culture and background) and create a Team name • Elect a team leader • All members must contribute • Each student must: o participate in interviews, o contribute to analysis and solution design, o speak during the final presentation
6. Organizational Partner (Mandatory) Your team must work with one real organization: • Minimum size: 100 employees • Sector: private, public, or non-profit • HR access required The organization must confirm:

coospace.metropolitan.hu

Though you are not sending chunks of expensive Carrera marble to the floor, the capstone editing process may make you feel that you are sacrificing excellent material. Like Michelangelo, your task is to remove unnecessary material. Your goal is to narrow the problem so that it is current, meaningful, grounded, and original.

To prepare:

• Go to the Walden Library.
• Find ProQuest, the database that has all dissertations & theses.
• Search for the author of the capstone listed below.
• Refer back to the video posted in the Week 4 Learning Resources on how to search in ProQuest.

Owens-Cunningham, A. (2021). Teacher perceptions on using differentiated instructional strategies in middle school. (Publication No. 2557408801) [Doctoral dissertation, Walden University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database.

Then:

• Review the problem statement on page 1.
• Review the purpose statement on pages 8-9 (focus on how the study components align).
• Use the following checklist and rubric to analyze the quality of the project study’s problem statement.

To complete:

• Explain whether you think this draft meets checklist and Rubric standards.
• Justify your evaluation.
• Use APA style for your citations.

 

• Walden University, LLC. (n.d.). Doctoral degree coachLinks to an external site.. https://coach.waldenu.edu/
  • Sign into your Doctoral Degre Coach. You will use the coach extensively when you are in the actual capstone phase. However, there are some resources that will also be helpful at this point.

 

• OASIS: Academic Skills Center. (n.d.-b). Doctoral capstone and residencyLinks to an external site.. Walden University. https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/academic-skills-center/success-strategies/doctoral-capstone
  • Review interesting articles on the Savvy Student Blog articles from students who graduated.

 

• Owens-Cunningham, A. (2021). Teacher perceptions on using differentiated instructional strategies in middle school. (Publication No. 2557408801) [Doctoral dissertation, Walden University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database.

 

• Walden University Library. (2015b). Searching and finding information in the library databases: OverviewLinks to an external site..  http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/searchingfinding

This week you will build on the simple logistic regression analysis did last week. You will use the same two variables (one independent variable and one dependent variable) you used in your SPSS analysis last week and add a second independent variable to the analysis. How has your statistical significance and odds ratio changed by the introduction of the second independent variable?
Use the one independent variable and one dependent variable you used to conduct your simple logistic regression analysis in Week 4.
Add a second independent variable to your analysis (multiple logistic regression).
Remember that your dependent variable must be dichotomous/binary.
Think about how you might use the odds ratio in your analysis to simplify the interpretation of your results.
How has your statistical significance and odds ratio changed by the introduction of the second independent variable?
Use SPSS to answer the research question you constructed. Write an analysis in APA format, including title page, references, and an appendix, that includes your data output and addresses each of the tasks listed above. The content should be 2–3 pages, including setup of the assignment and a discussion of whether the predictive relationship is statistically significant as well as the odds ratio and what it means. Your SPSS output should be included as an appendix.

Early in your Assignment, when you relate which dataset you analyzed, please include the mean of the following variables. If you are using the Afrobarometer Dataset, report the mean of Q1 (Age). If you are using the General Social Survey Dataset, report the mean of Age. If you are using the HS Long Survey Dataset, report the mean of X1SES. See page 1032 in your Warner textbook for an excellent APA-compliant write-up of a binary logistic regression analysis.

Step 2: Create the Power Point with a minimum of 10 content slides (as stated above). Place key points on the slides (maximum 5 lines, maximum 8 words each line). Each slide should contain speaker notes with in-text citations. Slides should be professional in appearance and feature picture and/or graphics as needed (must place citation under images unless Stock image—you do not need a reference for image citations). Provide recorded audio for each slide. Audio should be clean without interruptions or background noise.

Step 3: When you have completed the assignment, save a copy for yourself in an easily accessible place. Create a word document and copy and paste the speaker notes into the document to submit at the same time as the presentation (for plagiarism checker). The group leader will submit a copy of the Power Point and the word document to Canvas.

Group B:   Violence in the Community

1. Discuss the following types of violence that occur in communities: violence against children, Intimate partner violence, and Sexual Violence.
2. Visit the Healthy People 2030 website and discuss the goals for each of these types of violence.
3. Finally, describe the role of the Forensic nurse examiners (FNE)/ sexual assault nurse examiners (SANE) when dealing with each of these types of violence.

Create 1 slide for violence against children and 1 slide for national or global goal for violence against children.  Which would be slides 4 & 5 . Please include a reference page

Writing a proposal that functions as a focus of change is a significant part of being a social worker and policy advocate. The proposal is your opportunity to use your advocacy skills to change and improve the lives of others by influencing decision makers.

For this Assignment, you write a proposal for some form of social advocacy that will seek to change a social, organizational, or legislative policy. The proposal may also involve advocacy for the amelioration of a social problem. The purpose of this assignment is to thoughtfully and thoroughly plan how you will advocate for changing a social problem or policy that is of interest to you. The policy and advocacy practice can take whatever form you wish and can be on one or more of the following levels: agency, community, or state.

 

To Prepare: Read Chapter 8 of the Jansson text.  Selected at least five sources to support your advocacy proposal. The sources may be related to specific consequences of the social problem, issues related to the policy, or steps for advocacy.

By Day 7 Submit a 2- to 3- proposal that addresses the following:

Provide a brief synopsis of the social problem you selected in Week 2.  Provide a brief synopsis of the policy you selected in Week 4.  Explain your selection of a policy—why, as a policy advocate, did you select this specific policy to promote change regarding the social problem?   Identify the person or group who enacted the policy and explain their motivation or reason for advocating for this policy. How does the reason differ from your own advocacy and change goals?  Describe the ways in which the policy impacts the populations and discuss the consequences—intended and unintended. Hint : Build on your answer to the following part of your Week 4 Assignment:  Explain how this policy affects clients you might see in a clinical setting and why, as a clinical social worker, it would be important to advocate for change. Describe your initial work to change the policy (i.e., plan for social advocacy).  Be sure to incorporate the sources you found using standard APA format.

Policy and Politics in Healthcare Organizations  Instructions:

How can policies and politics affect a Healthcare Organization and Nursing academia?

Contribute a minimum of 5-6 pages. It should include at least 3 academic sources, formatted and cited in APA.

Be sure to review the academic expectations for your submission.

Submission Instructions:

Submit your assignment by 11:59 PM Eastern on Sunday. Review the rubric to determine how your assignment will be graded. Your assignment may be reviewed using a similarity-checking tool. If you are new to similarity-checking tools, please review the information available in the Student Resource Center.