Author: admin

Rationale: This assessment provides a unique opportunity for the students to develop an end-to-end project in social media analytics, starting from data collection and aiming to extract insights and drive conclusions. The project handles social media analytics lifecycle which mimics industry project’s setup.

Description: Assessment 2 is a group assessment undertaken in pairs (groups of two students) which tests students’ ability to analyze social media data using Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques and statistical methods.

The deliveries for this assessment:

Final project code and report for both parts A and B. (65%) Challenge Title

Understanding Sentiment, Topics, and Influence in Construction Discourse

Background and Motivation

Online social media platforms such as Reddit have become important spaces where professionals, practitioners, and the public discuss complex socio-technical issues. In the construction domain, Reddit users frequently discuss topics such as cost overruns, delays, regulation, sustainability, and the adoption of AI and digital technologies.

However, these discussions are:

Learning Outcomes to be Assessed:

Utilize various Application Programming Interface (API) services to collect data from different social media sources. Conduct basic social network and statistical analysis to render network visualisations and to understand network characteristics. Derive insights and discover patterns in structured social media data using methods such as correlation, regression, and classification. Extrapolate and analyse trends in unstructured-text data using natural language processing methods such as sentiment analysis and topic classification Large-scale and unstructured Emotionally charged Socially influenced, where certain users shape narratives more than others The challenge is to determine what people are talking about, how they feel, and who influences the conversation, using computational social media analytics techniques.

Solving this challenge helps organisations and researchers:

Understand public and professional sentiment Identify emerging themes and concerns Detect influential voices and communities Reflect on the societal implications of digital discourse Challenge Questions Students should frame their analysis around the following core challenge questions:

What are the dominant topics discussed in construction-related Reddit communities? What sentiments and emotions are associated with these topics, and how do they vary across time and communities? Who are the most influential users shaping these discussions, and how are communities structured? (Advanced / distinction level) How do LLM-based interpretations compare with traditional statistical and NLP-based findings? This assessment adopts a Data Study Group-inspired approach, in which ethical framing, responsible data use, and reflective practice are treated as integral components of the analytical process rather than as post-hoc considerations.

Dataset Data Provided

Students will work with a Reddit dataset containing approximately 10,000 comments, collected from construction-related subreddits.

The dataset includes (but is not limited to):

body – comment text author – Reddit username created_utc – timestamp subreddit – community name score – upvotes/downvotes comment_id, parent_id, link_id – discussion structure Data is collected programmatically using a provided Reddit API script, demonstrating ethical and reproducible data access.

Data Considerations

Data is publicly available Usernames must not be deanonymized Ethical use and limitations of social media data must be discussed The Challenge Tasks (Assessment Structure) The challenge is divided into two parts, aligned with CMP7202 learning outcomes.

Part A: Statistical analysis Challenge Task A1: Data Collection and Exploration

Students must:

Run the provided Reddit data collection script Load and inspect the dataset Perform descriptive statistical analysis (volume, activity, scores, time trends) Challenge Task A2: Network and Graph Analysis

Students must:

Construct a user interaction graph Apply centrality measures to identify influential users Detect and visualise communities Interpret what network structure reveals about discourse dynamics Challenge focus:

Influence is not measured by opinion alone, but by position in the network.

Students must support their statistical and network analysis with appropriate visualizations, such as temporal plots, distributions, and network graphs. All key analytical findings in Part A must be visually represented and clearly explained.

Part B – Understanding Meaning and Emotion Challenge Task B1: Sentiment Analysis

Students must:

Apply sentiment analysis to Reddit comments Analyse sentiment distribution: overall by subreddit over time Discuss limitations of automated sentiment detection Challenge Task B2: Topic Modelling

Students must:

Apply topic modelling (LDA, NMF, or BERTopic) Identify and label dominant themes Analyse how topics evolve and co-exist Challenge focus:

Topics are not fixed — they emerge, shift, and overlap.

Challenge Task B3: LLM-Assisted Interpretation (Advanced) Students may use LLMs to:

Label topics Summarise clusters of discussion Reflect on framing, stance, or narrative patterns LLM use must be:

Clearly documented Critically evaluated Used for analysis, not report writing All analyses in Part B must be accompanied by clear and interpretable visualisations, including but not limited to sentiment distributions, topic frequency plots, topic evolution over time, and thematic representations. Visualisations should be used to support interpretation and discussion, not merely presented without explanation.

Expected output:

Students must submit a single PDF report of a maximum of 2,000 words that presents the challenge background, methodology, results, discussion, limitations, and conclusion. In addition, students must submit an executable codebase or notebook that demonstrates the data collection process, analytical methods applied, and the visualisations used to support the findings.

For advice on writing style, referencing and academic skills, please make use of the Centre for Academic Success: Centre for Academic Success – student support | Birmingham City University (bcu.ac.uk)

Workload: 30 hours for 2000 words report and a presentation of 1000 words.

Module Code and Title    BL2267 Family Law: Adult Relationships
Module Leader Contact    Francesca Lee leef2@aston.ac.uk
Assessment Title    Family Law Essays
Assessment Weighting
100%

Word Count    2500 words

2.0 Assessment Overview

Assessment Mode (What do I need to produce at the end?)

You are required to produce a 2,500-word document (individual coursework). This document will consist of two essays that will be selected from the list of four essays. Both essay questions must be submitted together in a single document.
Task Description (What do I have to do for this assessment?

The assignment questions will be split into PART A – Essay Questions 1 and PART B – Essay Questions 2. You will be required to choose the ONE Essay Question from Part A and ONE Essay Question from PART B.
The total word count forbothPart A and Part B is 2,500 words (excluding footnotes and bibliography, according to OSCOLA)
You are expected to show appropriate legal authority including case law, legislation, and academic commentary.
You should reference using OSCOLA.
Your coursework must include:
The Aston Law School Assessment Cover Sheet
A clear indication of where each essay answer begins and ends.
A bibliography at the end of the document.

You must answer one question from Part A andone question from Part B below

Part A – Essay questions 1
Question One

“A family should be defined as a married man and wife with biological children.”

Critically evaluate this statement and develop a justified argument on the legal definition of the family, considering the legal and societal understandings of a family.

Question Two

In April 2022, the law on divorce, through the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Act 2020, removed the concept of fault from those wishing to divorce. We now have a ‘no-fault’ system for those wishing to end their marriages.

Develop a justified argument on whether the no-fault system of divorce represents a positive development in the law.

Part B – Essay Questions 2

Question Three

Using cases such as Geary v Rankine[2012] EWCA Civ 555 and relevant academic commentary, critically evaluate and develop a justified argument on whether the current law on ownership of the family home adequately protects cohabiting partners.

Question Four

Develop a justified argument on whether the Domestic Abuse Act 2021 represents a meaningful reform of domestic abuse law in England and Wales.

Submission Instructions (When and where do I submit?)
Please submit your assessment via your module’s Assessment Area on Blackboard. Guidance on how to submit can be found below:this guide to submitting to Turnitin assignments
Formatting requirements
·      File Format: MS Word document
·      Font: Sans serif (Arial or New Times Roman)
·      Font Size: 12pt
·      Font Size of Footnotes 10pt
·      Line Spacing: 1.5
·      Referencing:OSCOLA(with footnotes)

The word count is 2500. This is a strict word limit and does not include a 10% allowance.
The word count does not include:
·      The Aston Law School Assessment Cover Sheet
·      Headings identifying questions.
·      OSCOLA footnotes or bibliography
Coursework Layout
·      The first page of your assessment must be The Aston Law School Assessment Cover Sheet. This must not include your name.
·      All answers must be contained within one document.
·      You do not need to start each answer on a new page, but you must clearly mark the beginning and end of each answer.
Late or non-submission
Work submitted after the deadline without approved Exceptional Circumstances (EC) will be capped in line with university regulations. If you experience difficulties that prevent submission, you must apply for EC using the University process. Guidance is available here:  https://www.astonsu.com/support/academic/

3.0 Purpose of Assessment
Learning Outcomes (How does the assessment help me to demonstrate the outcomes of this module?)

This assessment is desinged to help you demonstrate an in-depth knowledge and understanding of the rules, principles and concepts of family law concerning adult relationships.

The assessment also measures your ability to undertake independent research, drawing on both primary legal sources and secondary academic commentary. You will demonstrate skills in critical analysis, evaluation, and engagement with current legal frameworks and debates.

In producing well-structured essays, you are required to construct a structured and reasoned argument that leads to a justified conclusion and is supported by appropriate authority. This process shows your capacity to communicate legal ideas clearly and persuasively.

This assessment will help demonstrate your ability to identify and discuss relevant legal, theoretical, and societal issues related to family law. This encourages a holistic understanding of how legal doctrine interacts with broader social contexts and contemporary challenges within the family justice system.

Assessment Rationale (Why am I doing this assessment?)

You are asked to complete two essays because this form of assessment best reflects the academic and practical skills required to study and understand family law in depth. Essay writing requires you to move beyond memorising legal rules and to demonstrate a critical, analytical, and evidence-based understanding of the key areas covered in the module.

Essays require you to make a clear argument, evaluate competing viewpoints, identify strengths and weaknesses in the law, and reach a well-supported conclusion. This shows your ability to think critically about legal problems and engage with academic debate.

The essays give you the opportunity to use both primary sources (cases and legislation) and secondary sources (books, journal articles, reports). This helps you develop the ability to find, interpret, and use legal materials—essential skills for your studies and for any future legal or academic work.

This coursework also encourages you to think about wider societal debates surrounding family law, such as how the law defines “family,” how relationships should be recognised, or how the law responds to issues like domestic violence. You are also encouraged to explore critical perspectives, including feminist theory, socio-legal analysis, and other academic viewpoints that challenge, question, or re-interpret the law. This means thinking not only about how the law works from a legal standpoint, but also how it can be understood or critiqued from social, political or cultural perspectives.

4.0 Feedback Expectations
When and where can I find my grades and feedback?
Staff will aim to return provisional marks for coursework assessments to students within four weeks of the submission deadline during term time.
For this module Summative Feedback and a provisional grade will be provided on 29 April 2026via Turnitin

Any grades that you see outside of My Aston Portal (MAP)should be thought of as provisional. Only final Exam Board approved grades will appear in MAP. Feedback and provisional grades can be accessed in Blackboard for both Turnitin and Blackboard Assignments. For Turnitin assignments, see our guide to accessing your Turnitin feedback.

5.0 Guidance on Artificial Intelligence Usage
The Use of Generative AI in your work is optional

For this assessment, the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) is optional. You may use AI for specific purposes that support learning, but AI-generated content must not replace core academic tasks. The use of AI may support, but not replace, your analysis and expression. The following uses are permitted:
·      Using generative AI to check your own understanding of the Assessment Brief or plan your time and tasks.
·      Using generative AI to support background research (for example, clarifying concepts, summarising material, or identifying potential sources while independently verifying the accuracy and validity of any information found) but not copying or reproducing AI-generated text in your assessment (your final submission must always be written in your own words).
·      Using generative AI to help to “brainstorm” or develop initial ideas (for example, argument flow).
·      Using generative AI to check or enhance the structure, grammar, spelling, or clarity of your writing (with your own critical assessment and judgement applied).

Any application or use of AI should be acknowledged within the Aston Law School Assessment Cover Sheet. The misuse of generative AI, as defined in Aston University’s assessment regulations, will be treated as an academic offence and may be subject to disciplinary action. The misuse of generative AI may include a failure to declare the use of generative AI.

You might find this guidance by The Learning Services team on the effective and ethical use of AI for assessments useful:Artificial Intelligence for study and assessment | Rise 360.

 

6.0 Assessment Tips
What further information and advice might help me complete this task?

To support you in completing this task, an Assessment Tips folder has been added to the Assessment Area on Blackboard for this module.

There will be:

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) that address common queries about the task, including word count, referencing, and formatting.

Family Law Assessment Checklistto review your submissionn against key requirements, ensuring you mean the word count, formatting, and referencing rules.

In addition, please attend the lecture in Week 5 – Assessment, Divorce, and Family Justice in which you will be provided with guidance on how to approach the assessment of questions and criteria.
7.0 Assessment Criteria and Rubric
What will my work be marked against?
Your work will be marked against the following criteria: (See full Rubric on Below)

1.    Subject Knowledge and Understanding (25%)
·      Demonstrate understanding of the principles of family law with depth and breadth appropriate to the level. Outstanding submissions show exceptional mastery; lower levels show limited or inaccurate knowledge
2.    Critical Thinking and Argument Building (25%)
·      Develop a coherent, structured, and justified argument directly relevant to the question. High marks require strong evaluation and logical reasoning; lower marks indicate minimal or descriptive argumentation.
3.    Research and Use of Sources (25%)
·      Use a wide range of primary and secondary sources effectively to support arguments. High-level work integrates literature critically, while lower-level work shows little or no research evidence.
4.    Structure, Presentation and Communication (20%)
·      Present work clearly and professionally, with logical structure and precise language. High marks reflect polished, readable essays; lower marks reflect unclear, repetitive, or confusing writing.
5.    Referencing (5%)
·      Use OSCOLA referencing consistently and accurately throughout, including footnotes and bibliography. Outstanding work shows flawless referencing; poor work shows inconsistency, errors, or omission of references

In this project, answer the following questions about aromatherapy as a  powerpoint.

Identification of a complementary therapy and its origins – Which therapy will you evaluate.

Description/Characteristics – Identify specifics to the culture. Include communication, family roles, high-risk health behaviors, nutrition, pregnancy, and childbearing practices, death rituals, spirituality, native healthcare practices, nursing/healthcare practice considerations

Indications for Treatment – Identify a condition or disease that the selected therapy is used to treat. Is the treatment complementary or an alternative to traditional medicine

Professional Nursing Responsibilities – What are your professional obligations regarding improper application of therapies, incompetent practitioners, dangerous treatments.

Client/Patient Education – Educate client to identify compatibilities with prescribed therapies. When to start/stop supplementation. When to notify the physician or FDA.

Discuss the relationship between ethics and values and provide 3 examples of each. Please submit this in a Microsoft Word document 2-3 pages and APA style.

Also, Discuss what a marriage and family therapist should do if he or she discovered that the law in his or her state contradicts the AAMFT Code of Ethics. This assignment is worth 34 points.

Financial analysis involves considering the factors that directly affect the initiative such as staffing, space, equipment, training, and education, etc. Once this information is known, a budget can be proposed for the strategic initiative and included as part of the business plan.
For this assignment, complete a financial analysis of the UnitedHealth Group by reviewing current company financial data such as income statements, budgets, net revenue, profit/loss statements, etc. Use that information and research about key budget items such as average salaries, cost of benefits, space and equipment costs, etc. to formulate a proposed budget for your strategic initiative.

ADDRESS the following in the form of an executive summary (250-500 words per bullet point):

·          Briefly describe the proposed strategic initiative including the proposed changes and expected outcomes based on the results of the SWOT analysis (which is attached separately)

·          Provide a simple budget for the strategic initiative. Include all relevant budget categories such as staffing (including salaries and benefits), space, equipment, training and education, and any other expenses related to the initiative. Create a table to efficiently present the key budget information.

·          Provide a financial data overview that summarizes what financial data you examined that informed your budget and a description of specific factors that informed each financial statement (net revenue, profit/loss, balance sheet, etc.).

·          Include at least one of the financial statements available from UnitedHealth Group (income statement, budgets, net revenue, profit/loss statements, etc.) as a figure or an appendix.

Write a 1,250-1,500-word draft of your health care research paper. Use your logic model (attached separately, named: Logical Model) to develop the sequence for your paper. Include the following

1.       Describe the health care administration (staff shortages & high turnover) or barrier you are addressing.

2.       Discuss resources needed, including key stakeholders and the role they play in your plan.

3.       Identify the characteristics of an effective health care leader and the role they will play in your plan.

4.       Identify any external or internal regulation that must be considered to ensure compliance with any legislative, institutional, or agency policy or expectation.

5.       Describe the organizational and strategical development structures/processes that address the problem.

6.       Present strategies for communicating your proposed plan.

*Use the research gathered in your literature review (attached separately name Table of Evidence) to provide support for your paper.

 

You are asked to conduct an independent case study on a new or emerging technology or innovation used in psychology research. This should take the form of an in-depth literature review of the emerging technology or innovation and should include the following information:

1. Background information on the emerging technology or innovation.
2. How this technology or innovation is used in psychological research.
3. The impact of this technology or innovation on psychological, social and/or biological outcomes.
4. Challenges and benefits involved in using this technology or innovation in psychological research.
5. Potential developments and future uses of this technology or innovation in psychological research.

Submission Details.

All work must be referenced appropriately in APA style. Students are required to sign a declaration that the work submitted constitutes their own work. You are referred to the University policy on plagiarism.

All students must submit:

• An electronic copy of the assignment must be submitted by you via Loop as an ePortfolio/Loop Reflect Assignment. The electronic copy submitted via Loop MUST include a front page with: Student Number and Module Code AND signed/typed plagiarism declaration
• See https://reflect.dcu.ie/view/view.php?t=3172f947097dbdfb2c66 for information on how to use Loop Reflect and how to submit a Loop Reflect assignment via Loop. There will be a specific tutorial class to follow which involves exploring how to use Loop Reflect.

 

Word count for text:

3000 words (excluding References, footnotes and Figures/Tables)

Tips and Tricks for doing this assignment in Loop Reflect 

You will need to include plenty of text in this assignment but there are lots of multimedia aspects that you could also include.

• Pictures/diagrams of technology/ Screenshots of App
• A link to a website/e-resource for the app
• A YouTube video outlining key aspects of the technology/innovation

Make sure that any multimedia you do include is there for a purpose – it should illustrate something, back up a point you have made or generally support the text in some way and should not be superfluous to your case study.

1. Demonstrate a critical awareness of current themes and debates in the sector which impact on development and evaluation of national policy.
2. Analyse and constructively critique social policy related to the development of the sector in national and international contexts drawing on rationales for provision of services for children.
3. Explain how policy changes impact on delivery and evaluation of services for children.

• You need to choose a topic that you did not cover in the presentation.

• Your arguments must be informed by reading and written in debate style.

• Links to be made to practice where applicable.

• Other debates and themes relating to the one you have chosen can be brought into your paper where applicable.

Problem 1 (25 Points)

Consider the lines L1L_1L1​ and L2L_2L2​ with parametric equations

$L1:x=1+3t,y=2-t,z=-3+4t.$
$L2:x=1-s,y=-2+s,z=4+2s.$

a) Are these lines L1L_1L1​ and L2L_2L2​ parallel to each other? Justify your answer.

b) Do the lines L1L_1L1​ and L2L_2L2​ intersect at some point? Justify your answer.

Problem 2 (25 Points)

Given the following implicit equation

$379+98x+7x2-32y+4y2=0$

a) Find the center and all four vertices of the ellipse described by the equation after writing it in standard form.

b) Parameterise all points on the ellipse using a minimal number of functions $y=f(x)$.

c) The equation is fulfilled for points (x,y)(x, y)(x,y) on the ellipse. What are the intervals XXX and YYY for admissible values $x\in X$ and $y\in Y$?

Problem 3 (25 Points)

Given

L1:x−4−2=y+18=z−32,andL2:x=−t,  y=−2+3t,  z=5t.L_1 : \frac{x – 4}{-2} = \frac{y + 1}{8} = \frac{z – 3}{2}, \quad \text{and} \quad L_2 : x = -t, \; y = -2 + 3t, \; z = 5t.L1​:−2x−4​=8y+1​=2z−3​,andL2​:x=−t,y=−2+3t,z=5t.

a) Find the smallest angle between the lines L1L_1L1​ and L2L_2L2​.

b) Find the shortest distance from the point $P=(2,7,5)$ on the line L1L_1L1​ to the line L2L_2L2​.

Problem 4 (25 Points)

Let TTT be the triangle with vertices A,B,A, B,A,B, and CCC given by

$A=(2,8,-2),B=(2,3,1),C=(1,0,5).$

a) Calculate the area of the triangle TTT.

b) Find the equation of the plane containing the points A,B,A, B,A,B, and CCC.

c) What is the distance of this plane from the origin.

Week 4 Case Study Analysis

You have been assigned a written case study analysis task where you will choose between two case studies: Case Study A – Exploring the Potential of Smartphone Support for Recently Discharged Patients with Chronic Illnesses Download Case Study A – Exploring the Potential of Smartphone Support for Recently Discharged Patients with Chronic Illnesses, or Case Study B – Urban Hospital Telemedicine Initiative Download Case Study B – Urban Hospital Telemedicine Initiative. Your task is to select one of the case studies and answer the provided Case Study Analysis Questions in a 3 to 4-page APA-formatted paper.

This assignment is intended to allow you to show evidence in achievement of the following course learning outcomes: 

Understand the foundational concepts of nursing informatics 

Analyze current and emerging technologies to support safe practice environments, and to optimize patient safety, cost-effectiveness, and health outcomes.

Demonstrate proficiency in utilizing informatics tools and technologies for various applications in nursing practice, education, research, quality improvement, population health management, and clinical decision-making.

Case Study Selection:

Read both Case Study A and Case Study B carefully.

Consider your interests, knowledge, and the relevance of each case study to your academic or professional goals.

Choose the case study that you find most compelling or relevant to your interests and expertise.

Case Study Analysis Questions:

If you choose Case Study A – Exploring the Potential of Smartphone Support for Recently Discharged Patients with Chronic Illnesses, answer the provided Case Study Analysis Questions related to smartphone support systems and their potential implications for post-discharge care management.

If you choose Case Study B – Urban Hospital Telemedicine Initiative, answer the provided Case Study Analysis Questions related to the implementation of telemedicine initiatives in urban hospital settings.

Paper Guidelines:

Your paper should be written in APA format, including a title page, proper citations, references, and overall organization.

Address each of the Case Study Analysis Questions thoroughly, providing insightful analysis and integrating information from relevant sources.

Incorporate at least 3 current peer-reviewed articles/references

Aim for a length of 3 to 4 pages, excluding the title page and references.

Ensure clarity, coherence, and proper grammar, punctuation, and sentence structure throughout your paper.

Submission:

Submit your completed written case study analysis paper via the dropbox

Rubric

Week 4 Case Study Analysis Rubric

Week 4 Case Study Analysis Rubric

Criteria          Ratings          Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDepth of Analysis

60 pts

Exceptional Outstanding or highest level of performance

Provides thorough and insightful analysis, demonstrating a deep understanding of the case study topic and addressing all aspects of the questions (1-4) in detail. Each is critically evaluated: Motivation, Integration Impact, Adoption, Benefits, Drawbacks

58 pts

Exceeds Very good or high level of performance

Offers comprehensive analysis with clear understanding of the case study topic and addresses most aspects of the question (1-4) adequately. Four of the five are critically evaluated: Motivation, Integration Impact, Adoption, Benefits, Drawbacks

50 pts

Meets Competent or satisfactory level of performance

Provides analysis that addresses the main aspects of the question adequately, but lacks depth or thoroughness in some areas. Three of the five are critically evaluated: Motivation, Integration Impact, Adoption, Benefits, Drawbacks

30 pts

Needs Improvement Poor or failing level of performance

Offers limited analysis that only partially addresses the question, lacking depth or thoroughness in most areas. One or two of the five are critically evaluated: Motivation, Integration Impact, Adoption, Benefits, Drawbacks

0 pts

Developing Unsatisfactory level of performance

Provides minimal or no analysis, with little to no understanding of the case study topic or question.

60 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntegration of Sources

20 pts

Exceptional Outstanding or highest level of performance

Integrates information from at least 3 current peer-reviewed articles, research studies, case analyses, and real-world implementations effectively to support arguments and claims.

18 pts

Exceeds Very good or high level of performance

Integrates information from at least 2 current peer-reviewed articles, research studies, case analyses, and real-world implementations to support arguments and claims adequately.

16 pts

Meets Competent or satisfactory level of performance

Integrates information from at least 1 current peer-reviewed article, research study, case analysis, or real-world implementation to support arguments and claims, but may lack diversity or relevance.

8 pts

Needs Improvement Poor or failing level of performance

Integrates limited or outdated information from sources to support arguments and claims, with minimal relevance or effectiveness.

0 pts

Developing Unsatisfactory level of performance

Does not integrate information from relevant sources effectively to support arguments and claims.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCustomization and Recommendations

20 pts

Exceptional Outstanding or highest level of performance

Provides comprehensive and highly insightful recommendations for customizing the technology. The recommendations offer innovative solutions to address specific challenges related to accessibility, cultural sensitivity, language barriers, and health literacy

18 pts

Exceeds Very good or high level of performance

The paper offers thorough and well-developed recommendations for customizing the technology. The recommendations address key considerations such as accessibility, cultural competence, and language diversity, providing practical suggestions for tailoring telemedicine and smartphone interventions to specific patient populations.

16 pts

Meets Competent or satisfactory level of performance

The paper provides adequate recommendations for customizing telemedicine and smartphone support systems to meet the diverse needs of patient. The recommendations address some key considerations related to accessibility, cultural sensitivity, and health literacy. While the recommendations demonstrate a basic understanding of the topic, they may lack depth or specificity.

8 pts

Needs Improvement Poor or failing level of performance

The paper offers limited or generic recommendations for customizing telemedicine and smartphone support systems to meet the diverse needs of patients. The recommendations may lack specificity or fail to address key considerations related to accessibility, cultural competence, and health literacy.

0 pts

Developing Unsatisfactory level of performance

The paper does not provide meaningful recommendations for customizing telemedicine and smartphone support systems to meet the diverse needs of patients. The recommendations may be unclear or irrelevant.

20 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Mechanics

20 pts

Exceptional Outstanding or highest level of performance

0–3 errors in APA, grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other elements of formal academic writing

18 pts

Exceeds Very good or high level of performance

4–5 errors in APA, grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other elements of formal academic writing

16 pts

Meets Competent or satisfactory level of performance

6-7 errors in APA, grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other elements of formal academic writing

8 pts

Needs Improvement Poor or failing level of performance

8-9 errors in APA, grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other elements of formal academic writing

0 pts

Developing Unsatisfactory level of performance

10 or more errors in APA, grammar, spelling, word usage, punctuation, and other elements of formal academic writing.

20 pts

Case Study A: Exploring the Potential of Smartphone Support for Recently Discharged Patients with Chronic Illnesses

Scenario: You are a member of the Health Professional-IT Innovation Council in a

community hospital system. The council is currently exploring the feasibility of utilizing

smartphone applications as a support system for recently discharged patients with

chronic illnesses. Your role involves investigating the potential of implementing such an

application and presenting your findings to the Council. This initiative aims to enhance

post-discharge care, reduce readmissions, and improve patient outcomes through the use

of innovative technology.

Case Study Questions:

1. What are the primary motivations behind the Health Professional-IT Innovation

Council’s exploration of smartphone application for recently discharged patients

with chronic illnesses?

2. How would the integration of smartphone applications impact existing healthcare

workflows, including considerations of efficiency, communication, and

coordination of care?

3. Discuss potential sources of resistance towards the adoption of smartphone

applications among healthcare providers, patients, and other stakeholders. What

strategies can be employed to overcome this resistance?

4. Based on your investigation and analysis, what are the potential benefits and

drawbacks of implementing smartphone applications for recently discharged

patients with chronic illnesses?

5. What evidence from research studies, case analyses, and real-world

implementations supports the effectiveness of smartphone-based interventions in

post-discharge care management?

6. How can smartphone applications be customized to meet the diverse needs of

patients and improve health education with various chronic illnesses and

socioeconomic backgrounds?

7. Provide recommendations for the Health Professional-IT Innovation Council on the

potential implementation of smartphone applications for recently discharged

patients with chronic illnesses, considering workflow considerations, resistance

factors, and ethical considerations.