BIT2027 Applied Project Management Assessment Brief 2026-27 | HUD

BIT2027 Applied Project Management Assessment Brief

Module Learning Outcomes

• Demonstrate understanding of key principles and business applications of project management through a structured visual presentation.
• Apply appropriate project risk management tools and techniques to identify, assess, and propose responses to project risks.
• Analyse human and organisational factors influencing project success and team performance.
• Interpret and apply project data (time, cost, quality, or performance metrics) to support project decisions.
• Organise and present financial and non-financial project data visually and coherently to address stakeholder needs.
• Evaluate project team and stakeholder dynamics and propose creative approaches to address identified challenges.
• Reflect on personal learning in managing a simulated or selected project scenario.

Assignment Specific Resources

Software

Students will use the following software to complete the assessment. All required tools are free and accessible through a web browser:

• Google Gemini and Google AI Studio (Build Function): used to create a small AI-powered tool that supports a project management task (e.g., risk analysis generator, stakeholder mapping engine, scheduling assistant). Students can access Google AI Studio for free using their personal Google accounts.
• Microsoft Office 365 (Word, Excel, PowerPoint): provided free via the University’s Office 365 licence and available on all University computers.
• Canva (free version): an optional online tool for designing the academic poster.

Assessment Task

You are required to produce an individual academic poster with an accompanying 1,500-word analytical and reflective commentary, based on a selected or simulated project case scenario. The poster should visually present key project management components, including: scope definition, stakeholder and team analysis, risk assessment, data interpretation (e.g., time, cost, quality, or performance metrics), and lessons learned.

As part of the assessment, you must use Google Gemini and Google AI Studio (Build Function) to create a small AI-powered tool that supports one or more project management tasks (e.g., a risk analysis generator, stakeholder mapping engine, scheduling calculator, EVM interpreter, or scope assessment tool). You will integrate the outputs of this AI tool into your poster and critically evaluate its usefulness in the accompanying text.

Task Specific Guidance

This assessment requires the application of project management principles, tools, and techniques to analyse a project scenario and communicate findings through both visual and written formats. The following expectations apply:

1. Core Knowledge Requirements (Level 5)

To achieve a pass, you must demonstrate understanding of:

• Key project management concepts such as scope, risk, scheduling, stakeholders, team dynamics, communication, and project data interpretation.
• The use of project management tools and techniques appropriate for Level 5, such as risk registers, stakeholder mapping, Gantt-style scheduling, and basic performance metrics (e.g., CPI, SPI).
• How AI tools (Google Gemini + Google AI Studio) can support decision-making and analysis within a project context.

2. Supporting Evidence and Sources

Your work should draw upon:

• Core and recommended project management textbooks
• Peer-reviewed academic literature
• Industry guidance, such as APM or PMI resources
• Your own earlier analytical work (risk analysis, data interpretation, stakeholder assessment, etc.)
• Outputs generated by your AI tool, clearly referenced and critically evaluated

You are encouraged to integrate appropriate tables, visuals, and data summaries where relevant.

3. Core Intellectual and Cognitive Skills (Level 5)

Your assessment must demonstrate:

• Analysis: breaking down project problems and interpreting evidence
• Application: applying project management theory to a case scenario
• Evaluation: assessing risks, stakeholder dynamics, and project data
• Critical reflection: recognising what you learned and how the AI tool influenced your decisions
• Synthesis: combining different elements into a coherent poster and commentary

4. Writing Style, Structure, and Presentation

Poster:

• Clear, visual layout suitable for a professional audience
• Appropriate use of tables, diagrams, charts, and structured content
• Concise, well-organised, and visually coherent

Accompanying Text (1,500 words):

• Written in an academic style
• Structured with headings and subheadings
• Includes analysis, justification of methods, evaluation of AI outputs, and personal reflection
• Correct citations and reference list (APA 7)

5. Other Assessed Skills

This assessment also evaluates:

• Visual communication and data presentation
• Ethical and transparent use of AI tools
• Interpretation of structured AI output
• Ability to translate complex project concepts into accessible visuals
• Individual initiative in building a functional AI-assisted mini-tool

6. Word Count Guidance

Included in the word count (1,500 words):

• All written content in the accompanying text
• Any discussion, analysis, explanation, and interpretation
• Headings and subheadings

Not included in the word count:

• Poster content
• Tables, charts, diagrams, models, figures
• AI tool screenshots
• References and bibliography
• Appendices (if used)
• Titles and labels

You will be penalised for exceeding the word limit by ±10%.

UGT Marking Criteria Grid Template

This is a template only. Schools are required to add to the criteria with subject-specific language in accordance with the assessment and assessment type. Schools must ensure that they include the full criteria they will use to provide clear indications of how achievement of module learning outcomes may be demonstrated, thereby promoting the reliability of assessment. The marking criteria should be kept in the Module Handbook.

Once completed, this guidance (in red text) should be deleted.

 

General / Knowledge	Grade Range	Description	1. Presentation and Structure 2. Understanding / Skills 3. Selection of cited material
General / Knowledge	80 and above	Outstanding work, demonstrating comprehensive mastery of knowledge, understanding and extensive critical appreciation of the subject area.	1. Work is well structured and academically presented with clear attention to grammar and to the use of language, expression and style. Some degree of originality. 2. Evidence of highly significant and relevant evaluation skills and conclusions 3. Very significant evidence of reading outside the material presented in academic sessions and the directed texts. Sources used selectively and skilfully to support the argument. Referencing is extensive, accurate and relevant
General / Knowledge	70-79	Excellent work, demonstrating mastery of knowledge, understanding and critical appreciation of the subject area	1. Work is well structured and academically presented with clear attention to grammar and to the use of language, expression and style. 2. Evidence of highly significant and relevant evaluation skills and conclusions 3. Significant evidence of reading outside the material presented in academic sessions and the directed texts. Sources used selectively and skilfully to support the argument. Referencing is extensive, accurate and relevant
General / Knowledge	60-69	Very good work, demonstrating very good knowledge, understanding and appreciation of the subject area	1. Work is well structured and academically presented with clear attention to grammar and to the use of language, expression and style. 2. Evidence of very good and relevant evaluation skills and conclusions 3. Evidence of reading outside the material presented in academic sessions and the directed texts. Referencing is appropriate, accurate and relevant.
General / Knowledge	50-59	Good work, demonstrating good knowledge, understanding and appreciation of the subject area	1. Work is well structured and academically presented with clear attention to grammar and to the use of language, expression and style. 2. Evidence of good and relevant evaluation skills and conclusions 3. Evidence of some reading outside the material presented in academic sessions and the directed texts. Referencing is adequate, accurate and relevant.
General / Knowledge	40-49	Satisfactory work, demonstrating sufficient knowledge, understanding and appreciation of the subject area.	1. Work is structured and academically presented with clear attention to grammar and to the use of language, expression and style 2. Some evidence of good and relevant evaluation skills and conclusions 3. Evidence of some limited reading outside the material presented in academic sessions and the directed texts. Referencing is limited.
General / Knowledge	30-39	Unsatisfactory work: Demonstrating very limited knowledge or understanding of the subject area	1. Work is not structured well or academically presented with a lack of attention to grammar and to the use of language, expression and style 2. Minimal evidence of good and relevant evaluation skills and conclusions 3. Some evidence of some limited reading outside the material presented in academic sessions and the directed texts. Referencing is minimal.
General / Knowledge	0-29	Poor / very poor work Demonstrating inadequate, limited knowledge and fragmentary understanding of the subject area.	1. Work is not structured well or academically presented with a lack of attention to grammar and to the use of language, expression and style 2. No or very limited evidence of good and relevant evaluation skills and conclusions 3. No or very limited evidence of further reading and referencing

BUS6017 Independent Study Report Assignment Brief 2026 | Arden University

 

Word Count	3,000 words
Assessment Type	Report

 

Click here see the Samples list of Arden University Assignment Samples

Assignment Brief

As part of the formal assessment for the programme you are required to submit a Independent Study assignment. Please refer to your Student Handbook for full details of the programme assessment scheme and general information on preparing and submitting assignments.

Learning Outcomes:

After completing the module, you should be able to:

1. Carry out an independent study based on an issue/problem/challenge appropriate to the discipline related to the student’s programme study area.
2. Design an appropriate research process to gather secondary data using a range of techniques and sources, and critically analyse the generated information to address the problem.
3. Develop a project report that discusses the research results.
4. Contextually innovative through applying skills of critical, creative, and evidenced based analysis and personal reflection to current real-world situations and future challenges.

All learning outcomes must be met to pass the module.

Guidance

Your assignment should include: a title page containing your student number, the module name, the submission deadline and the exact word count of your submitted document; the appendices if relevant; and a reference list in AU Harvard system(s). You should address all the elements of the assignment task listed below. Please note that tutors will use the assessment criteria set out below in assessing your work.
You must not include your name in your submission because Arden University operates anonymous marking, which means that markers should not be aware of the identity of the student. However, please do not forget to include your STU number.

Maximum word count: 3,000 words

Please refer to the full word count policy which can be found in the Student Policies section here: Arden University | Regulatory Framework

The word count includes everything in the main body of the assessment (including in text citations and references). The word count excludes numerical data in tables, figures, diagrams, footnotes, reference list and appendices. All other printed words ARE included in the word count.

Students who exceed the wordcount up to a 10% margin will not be penalised. Students should note that no marks will be assigned to work exceeding the specified limit once the maximum assessment size limit has been reached.

Assignment Task

Task 1:

You are required to produce an appropriately structured research project report based on a topic of your choice, appropriate to your study programme subject area, and showing all essential elements. The report should also include a reflective account of your professional development that reviews how you generated, developed, refined the project idea and executed the research project.

Your research report should be structured as follows:

 

Report Sub-Task	Suggested word count
Introduction	300 words
Ethical Statement	300 words
Overview and Research Approach	800 words
Analysis and Discussion	800 words
Conclusion and Recommendation	500 words
Reflective Account	300 words
Total	3000 words

 

Important assignment Notes:

This project report is approved for a secondary research approach only. This means that you can use only already published sources to complete your research project report.

You do NOT have any approval for a primary research approach, for example, you do NOT have approval to complete any interviews or complete any survey/questionnaires as part of your research.

Any assignment that contains the use of primary research methods will not be able to achieve a pass grade.
Guidance on the development of the report is contained in the lessons and will also be provided on a weekly basis in the sessions with your lecturer. You must obtain approval for your project report title from your lecturer before you proceed to develop the final report.

Total Marks: 100
Total word count: 3000 words
(LOS: 1, 2, 3, 4)

Formative Feedback

You have the opportunity to submit a outline draft to receive formative feedback.
The feedback is designed to help you develop areas of your work and it helps you develop your skills as an independent learner.

If you are a distance learning student, you should submit your work, by email, to your tutor, no later than 2 weeks before the actual submission deadline. If you are a blended learning student, your tutor will give you a deadline for formative feedback and further details.

Formative feedback will not be given to work submitted after the above date or the date specified by your tutor – if a blended learning student.

Referencing Guidance

You MUST underpin your analysis and evaluation of the key issues with appropriate and wide ranging academic research and ensure this is referenced using the AU Harvard system(s).
Follow this link to find the referencing guides for your subject: Arden Library

Submission Guidance

Assignments submitted late will not be accepted and will be marked as a 0% fail.
Your assessment can be submitted as a single Word (MS Word) or PDF file, or, as multiple files.
If you chose to submit multiple files, you must name each document as the question/part you are answering along with your student number ie Q1 Section A STUXXXX. If you wish to overwrite your submission or one of your submissions, you must ensure that your new submission is named exactly the same as the previous in order for the system to overwrite it.

You must ensure that the submitted assignment is all your own work and that all sources used are correctly attributed. Penalties apply to assignments which show evidence of academic unfair practice. (See the Student Handbook which is available on the A-Z key information on iLearn.)

BIS3002 E-Commerce E-Business Applications Assessment 4 Brief 2026 | APIC

Assessment Brief: BIS3002 E-Commerce E-Business Applications

Assessment Overview

 

Assessment Task	Type	Weight	Length	Due	ULOs Assessed
Assessment 4: E-commerce Site In groups of two, students will develop an e-commerce business plan for a client based on a given case study, and subsequently design a limited prototype using the WordPress platform.	Group	35%	Report 4000 Words (equiv. 2000 words per student) + WordPress E-Commerce Prototype 10 Pages	Week 12	ULO1 ULO2 ULO3 ULO4

 

equiv. – equivalent word count based on the Assessment Load Equivalence Guide. It means this assessment is equivalent to the normally expected time requirement for a written submission containing the specified number of words.

Assessment 4: E-commerce Site

 

Due date:	Week 12
Group/individual:
Word count/Time provided:	Report 4000 Words (equiv. 4000 words) + WordPress ECommerce Prototype containing 10 Pages
Weighting:	35%
Unit Learning Outcomes:	ULO 1, ULO 2, ULO 3, ULO 4

 

Assessment 4 Detail

In groups of two, based on a given case study, you will develop an e-commerce business plan for a client. Your group will subsequently design a limited prototype website according to this plan.

The case study to be used for the e-commerce website is “C2 Hal’s Woodworking” which can be found in the textbook Electronic Commerce by Gary P. Schneider on page p76.
https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/apicollege/reader.action?docID=6351248&ppg=76

Based on the combined expertise you have gained from your Assignment 1 Evaluations; in this assignment you will produce an e-commerce design plan and a small 10-page ecommerce prototype running on the WordPress platform. Your goal is to create an online store that will complement Hal’s Woodworking business model.

Part A: Your group should produce an e-commerce design plan that includes:

1. SWOT analysis of the business environment
2. Marketing strategy which describes the target customer, proposes a social media campaign and SEO
3. Discussion of key features the site will implement
4. Proposed site customer-centric design, including storyboards for each page and the content to be included on the site.

Part B: Your group will implement you proposed design on the WordPress platform (wordpress.com). You will create a free tier account which will permit you to create 10 site pages, select an appropriate template, and lay out the site.
Please note the platform requires minimum knowledge of HTML programming, all the tools on the backend are WYSIWYG. You may visit the support section for additional tips of how to use the WordPress platform: https://wordpress.com/support/
In addition, your team should keep a detailed log of each student’s contributions to the overall assignment. This can be in any format (suggested: Excel spreadsheet or Google Sheet). This is to be included as an appendix to your report.

BIS3002 Assessments 4 Marking Criteria and Rubric

• The assessment will be marked out of 100 marks and will be weighted 35% of the total unit mark.
• The marking criteria and rubric are shown on the following page.

 

Marking Criteria	Not Satisfactory (0-49% of the criterion mark)	Satisfactory (50-64% of the criterion mark)	Good (65-74% of the criterion mark)	Very Good (75-84% of the criterion mark)	Excellent (85-100% of the criterion mark)
SWOT and Marketing Strategy (20 marks) SWOT analysis of the business environment. Marketing strategy which describes the target customer, proposes a social media campaign and SEO.	SWOT is incomplete or irrelevant to the topic. Marketing strategy elements are missing or lack basic explanations.	SWOT is completed but is mostly general with minimal links to the case study. Marketing strategy elements are identified and there are some basic explanations.	SWOT is completed with some relevant details from the case study. Marketing strategy elements are identified and well explained.	SWOT is detailed and researched with reference to the case study. Marketing strategy elements are identified and defined with detailed proposals. Information is well documented with some citations.	SWOT is detailed and well researched with close reference to the case study. Marketing strategy elements are identified clearly, defined in detail, and specific and effective proposals are provided. Information is comprehensively and logically documented with several citations.
Design Plan and Key Features (20 marks) Discussion of key features the site will implement. Proposed site customer-centric design, including storyboards for each	The design description is not adequately explained so that it can be understood by a client. Minimal storyboards included. Inconsistent design with no consideration of elements such as navigation.	The design description is adequately explained so that it can be understood. Several storyboard details are missing. More consideration needs to be given to elements such as navigation. Some inconsistency between pages.	The design description is clear and effective. Some storyboard details missing. Good layouts for pages with navigation and media elements included but with some minor inconsistencies	The design description is very clear, specific and effective. All storyboards for each page provided but some minor details missing. Wellbalanced, visually pleasing layout with good consideration of navigation and media elements.	The design description effectively and accurately explains all of the system so that it can be completely understood. Storyboards provide descriptions of media, user and interaction, including their use/purpose/objective. Elements are grouped in logical positions. Navigation is very clear and logical.

 

 

page and the content to be included on the site.
Site template design and page layouts (20 marks) WordPress site template customised for case study design as per part A, containing a unique design. Pages created containing information as per the storyboards, layout according to E-Commerce conventions.	Minimal theme implementation. Critical or major elements are not relevant or missing. Poor layout and navigational design. Major layout inconsistencies found between screens. No consideration for Ecommerce conventions or case study requirement	Basic theme (downloadable) with little customisation. Some missing details but overall adequate coverage of major functions. Basic layout with some inconsistencies. Colour scheme, fonts and navigation have been considered but could be improved to better suit the topic.	Theme has been customised to suit the case study. Some minor missing details but overall good coverage of major functions. Good layout with some minor inconsistencies. Colour scheme, fonts and navigation have been well thought out and suit the topic.	Consolidated, consistent theme with major customisation to suit the case study well. Most of the required functions and elements included. Very good layout and design considerations such as logos have also been included. Colour scheme, fonts and navigation have been very well thought out to suit the case study and E-commerce conventions.	Unique and attractive theme closely aligned to case study. All required functions and elements are represented. Excellent layout and unique additions such as a customised logo. Consistent between screens, well integrated, logical intuitive placement of elements according to Ecommerce conventions.
Page contents and media (20 marks) Examples of appropriate media included such as	Few or no media elements include to enhance the theme. Inadequate number of pages included to demonstrate the site.	Some basic media elements that enhance the theme and add to the user experience. Adequate number of pages to demonstrate the main features of the site. Basic content on each page that is somewhat relevant to	A few good media elements that enhance the theme and add to the user experience. A good number of pages included that demonstrate most of the features of the site.	Several good media elements that enhance the theme and add to the user experience. 10 pages included that demonstrate most of the features of the site.	Several excellent media elements that enhance the theme and add to the user experience. 10 pages included that demonstrate all of the features of the site.
photographs or videos. A number of product pages containing example products and descriptions. Additional support or descriptive pages such as “about us”	Content is poorly written and/or not relevant to the case study.	the case study. Content lacks detail and may contain a small number of errors.	Well written but simple content on each page that is mostly relevant to the case study. Minor writing errors.	Well written and quite detailed content on each page that is very relevant to the case study. Few writing errors.	Professionally written and detailed content on each page that is highly relevant to the case study. Error-free writing.
Project Log (10 marks) A spreadsheet or journal is regularly updated with each student’s contribution to the assignment.	Minimal detail – not possible to understand each student’s contributions to the assignment.	Adequate explanation of each student’s contribution but lacking details and dates completed. Each student’s contribution can be understood to some extent.	Good explanation of each student’s contribution with some detail provided including some dates of completed elements. Each student’s contribution can be understood.	Detailed explanation of each student’s contribution including dates completed and suggestions for improvement. Clearly shows each student’s contribution.	Very detailed and descriptive log of all student work, descriptions of work conducted, and dates completed. Improvements and revisions are also noted. Very clearly shows each student’s contribution.
Academic skills (10 marks) Quality of writing and referencing.	Poor ability in report writing, with several gaps in the quality of written expression and presentation. Several major referencing errors or absent referencing.	Some major gaps evident in the quality of written expression and presentation. Significant further work needed in report writing technique, improvement needed in the formatting of references and citations.	Some gaps evident in the quality of written expression and presentation. Further work needed in report writing technique, including some minor formatting of references and citations.	Quality of written expression and presentation mostly conforms to academic standards relating to clarity of expression, syntax, grammar, and punctuation. No significant gaps in referencing technique using the Harvard referencing system.	Quality of written expression and presentation is excellent and conforms fully to academic standards relating to clarity of expression, syntax, grammar, and punctuation. No gaps in referencing technique using the Harvard referencing system.

4SC012 Introduction to Research Skills 4SC012 Assignment Brief Module Title: Introduction to Research Skills Module Code: 4SC012 Assignment Title: Research Project Submission Deadline: 5th May 2026 (2PM)

Assignment Overview This assignment (2000 words) is designed to assess your understanding of research concepts and processes. You will be required to identify a research area, describe relevant research processes, and reflect on the skills needed to conduct effective research.

LO1: Identify an area of research LO2: Describe different types of research processes LO3: Outline the skills necessary to conduct research Task 1: Research Area Identification (LO1) (Approx.500 words approx.)

You are helping people in social care who face problems such as social isolation, mental health concerns, or lifestyle-related health issues. They are unsure whether the social care services recommended to them (like social prescription, group therapy, or support programs) will really help.

Your task is:

Select one area from the above scenario that interests you and create a research question. Explain why the selected area is relevant and important within the academic or practical context of social care. Task 2: Research Processes (LO2) (Approx. 700 words approx.)

Describe the types of research methodologies (qualitative or quantitative) relevant to your research question. Explain what qualitative and quantitative research are. Explain and compare the advantages and disadvantages of qualitative and quantitative research methodologies. Task 3: Skills for Research (LO3) (Approx. 400 words approx.)

Describe the skills necessary to conduct research effectively, such as critical thinking, data collection, and ethical reasoning. Task 4: Personal reflection (Approx. 400 Words)

Describe what research is and why it is used in social care. Discuss how your learning from this module will personally support your social care practice in the future. **As this is a personal reflection, it is expected to be written in the first person

Submission Guidelines Format: Typed, 1.5 spaced, using a standard font (e.g., Arial, size 12). Referencing: Use the Harvard style for citations and references. (A minimum of 10 academic references must be included in your assignment to support your descriptions.) Submission: Submit your assignment through the university’s online portal Turnitin by the deadline.

Overview Kant’s humanity formula states that all human beings have absolute value as persons and thus should be treated with respect and dignity as ends and never used merely as means. In other words, human beings should never be used as tools but should always be respected as absolutely valuable ends in themselves. For example, if you visit a grocery store, you should treat the cashier as an end, that is, as a person of worth who offers more than just serving as a means to your end of obtaining food. Do not treat the cashier as a tool for obtaining food. Rather, treat the person with respect and dignity. Smile and be polite. Perhaps, look for opportunities for meaningful conversation, et cetera.

While this concept is timeless, different generations may have different views on how this concept looks within the workplace. In addition, changing expectations related to gender influence this concept. For this assignment, imagine you are presenting to a group of human resource professionals at a conference. This group is interested in improving gender and generational conversations at the workplace, so they are interested in different opinions surrounding this topic. You want to take a philosophical approach to this topic, so you decide to use Kant’s humanity formula as a guidance.

Instructions Part 1: Interview For your interview:

Select two individuals from different generations (Baby Boomer, Gen X, Gen Y (Millennial), and Gen Z (Centennial)). Conduct each interview using the questions provided on your Interview Worksheet [DOC]. Use a separate worksheet for each interviewee. Record their responses in the spaces provided. Part 2: Presentation Once you have completed both of the interviews, create a 5–8-minute audio presentation in which you do the following:

Explain how Kant’s humanity formula influenced your understanding of the interview. Compare similar themes in the responses. Contrast noticeable differences in the responses. Explain how generational differences may have influenced the responses. Explain how changing expectations with gender influenced the responses. You may choose the format of your presentation. Some suggestions are:

A 6–12-slide PowerPoint presentation (or another choice of presentation software) with audio. Refer to the PowerPoint section of the Tools and Resources page for PowerPoint tutorials. A 5–8-minute presentation recorded using Kaltura, a program offered by Capella that records audio and video. Refer to the Audio and Video in this Course section of the Tools and Resources page for more information. A 5–8-minute podcast. Submit both interview worksheets and your presentation. Include a transcript of your presentation.

Presentation Requirements Your presentation should meet the following requirements:

Length of recording: 5–8 minutes. Length of slideshow (if using): 6–12 slides. Format: The format you choose for your presentation must be one that your instructor can access for review and grading. Do not submit files from non-standard software programs. You can reference Capella’s Computer Requirements for more information about our standard software programs. Depending on the format you choose, upload or attach your presentation to the assignment area or provide a link in the submission box. Make sure to give your instructor access to the recording if necessary. Refer to the Interview: Generational Differences Regarding Workplace Ethics rubric to ensure you meet all expectations for this assignment.

Evidence-Based Practice
Assignment Information

Literature Review to critically evaluate and discuss the evidence underpinning a clinical nursing policy, clinical practice area or professional issue, and the impact on professional integrity and practice.

Submission is in Canvas, as a word document by 13:00hrs on the Monday of Week 8 Please see the assignment page on canvas for the submission date and time.

There is a 3000-word fixed word limit for this assessment submission. This means that there will be marking penalty for exceeding the number of words allowed. This excludes the front page (declaration), references and appendices. Please note it does include the content of tables.

This submission assesses all the Module Learning Outcomes:

1. Discuss the role of research in informing evidence-based practice and promoting professionalism.
2. Critically assess the quality and validity of evidence which may be used to inform clinical practice.
3. Critically analyse how the credibility of evidence is determined and how it influences professional practice.
4. Systematically and critically evaluate the contribution evidence-based practice can make to policy decisions.

The first page must include the academic integrity declaration, which is included in the submission space.

Please use the following formatting:

• 1.5-line spacing
• font: Arial, Calibri or New Times Roman; size 12
• Left alignment of main text
• No indentation of paragraphs or of the reference list
• Reference list should be formatted with single line spaces.
• Please do not add borders or any other decorative elements to your work.

Evidence-Based Practice
Assignment Information

Select a clinical nursing policy, practice area or professional issue. The focus/topic is your choice, though it must have a clear focus on nursing. It can be something discussed as part of the module, something you have read about, or an area of your clinical practice. Please remember that confidentiality must be maintained and do not name hospitals, trusts, or wards for example.

To fully meet all the Learning Objectives, the discussion and evaluation must include the following:

The role of research and other evidence in developing EBP and supporting clinical practice The significance of using high quality evidence to support EBP development (include the quality, validity and credibility of the evidence)
The role of research and EBP in promoting professionalism.
Discussion around how EBP influences professional practice
Critical evaluation of the contribution EBP can make to policy decisions.
Evidence of critical analysis and discussion throughout
Citation to support points and discussion

Introduction

Sets the scene and provides an overview of the policy, procedure or clinical practice you will be discussing:

• Overview of your selected policy, guideline or procedure
• Why it was selected: Link your work to the evidence which prompted you to select this area.

Main Body of the work

• Discuss themes, observations, and findings from the sources in your literature search.
• Are the sources selected reliable? Credible? Valid?
• What does all this information tell you?
• Are there any elements which are missing in the research and evidence that you have reviewed so far?
• critical debate, with analysis of the literature and research to support your work

Conclusion

Use this to summarise your writing and draw your ideas together.

• Summarise the discussions • What are your key findings?
• What are the implications for nursing practice and professional integrity. How are they influenced by evidence-based practice.
• Do you have any recommendations or suggestions for practice or further study?

Evidence-Based Practice
Assignment Information

Reference list

• Does not count in your word count
• A reference should be included for all in-text citations, a reference list should be included at the end in Harvard referencing style
• Use single line spacing and begin on a new page
• Use Cite them Rite and contact library for support • Do not use AI to create or amend the reference list.

Appendices

This is where to include additional tables and information if you choose to use them. They are not included in your word count or included in your mark.

Useful things to remember:

• This is a nursing degree therefore the content should be linked to nursing
• Take the time to ensure that your work demonstrates your ability to meet all of the learning outcomes.
• When completing your assignment please check your work against the marking criteria as these are what your work will be marked against.
• Support all your writing with credible literature
• Any literature you use should be carefully cited and referenced using the Harvard method. Use Cite them Right for support: Cite them right online – Home
• Remember to paraphrase and use quotation marks when including direct quotes.
• Use the complete word allowance.

Week 4 – Assignment: Avoid/Reduce (Use the A in the A-S-I Framework) Instructions Assignment Directions:

Part #2 of 4: Focusing on the Avoid/Reduce pillar of the Avoid-Shift-Improve (A-S-I) Framework, describe and depict the need to improve the efficiency of the transport system as a whole. This is a big picture view. Use data and depictions as appropriate. Submit a paper in Microsoft Word format with your description of the trend/issue and your city selection using the Avoid-Shift-Improve Framework. Include a title page, 3-5 pages for the body of your paper, and References. Cite references in APA 7 format. You may use Artificial Intelligence (AI) to assist you with this assignment. Provide an appropriate citation if you do so.

Submission Instructions: Please attach the assignment in Word Format. Format your paper consistent with APA 7 guidelines. Provide a minimum of 3 in text citations with a Reference List also in APA 7 format.

What is the Avoid-Shift-Improve Framework?

The Avoid-Shift-Improve (A-S-I) framework is a structured approach to reducing the environmental impact of transportation and logistics. It focuses on avoiding unnecessary transport, shifting to more sustainable modes, and improving the efficiency of existing systems. The A-S-I framework supports the transition towards solutions such as cleaner energy, sustainable cities, climate action and low-carbon mobility.

The A-S-I framework emphasizes reducing the need for travel as a primary step, which can be achieved through urban planning and policies that minimize travel distances (X-city) and promote telecommuting. For example, shifting travel from private cars to more sustainable modes such as public transit, cycling, and walking. This shift is crucial for reducing greenhouse-gas emissions and improving urban mobility.

Improving the efficiency of transport modes involves adopting cleaner technologies, such as electrification of vehicles, and enhancing the operational efficiency of transport systems. Low-emission vehicles (LEVs) and better public transport systems like Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) are examples.

Effective implementation requires coordinated efforts across various sectors and alignment with broader Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This includes involvement of multiple stakeholders, such as policymakers, urban planners, service providers, and citizens to ensure comprehensive and integrated approaches to sustainable transport.

The A-S-I framework can also be linked to broader sustainable development goals, addressing not only environmental impacts but also social and economic dimensions. Actions under this framework can contribute to multiple goals.

Synthesis: Consensus.AI + Microsoft Copilot AI, Oct 20, 2024; Revised: Dr. Ernest Hughes, Nov 2, 2024

Video:

TUMI mobilize minds. (2024, August). TUMI.

Goals:

The 17 Goals. (n.d.). United Nations.

See the attachment for the paper template for this assignment.

Attachment:

Student Paper Template APA 7th.docx

(23.79 KB)

Submission Instructions:

A 3–5-page Word Document Must include a title page, abstract, and references. These are not counted in the page count/slide count. Use Student Paper Template APA 7th 002 Academic Integrity [content page]

Assignment Rubric

This assignment aligns with the following:

Course Objectives 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 & 7 [content page] Learning Objectives 1.1, 2.1, 3.1, 4.1, 5.1, 6.1 & 7.3 [content page] Resources & Supports

Office 365: You have free access as an APUS student. Sign in with your MyCampus Email credentials. Submitting and Confirming a Submission: Watch this 3-minute video if you need guidance on submitting your assignment.

PHIL 2033 FINAL ESSAY Topics and Guidelines

General information:

All students will complete three original essays in conjunction with Module mastery Tests 2-4; these will be completed as in-class timed writing assignments. Near the end of the semester (see course schedule or BB) students will revise one of these essays for additional assessment. At that time, both content and formatting will be evaluated. Basic requirements for final essays are stated below.

Each paper topic has specific requirements that count for credit. Thus, students are encouraged to read the basic guidelines for their chosen topic carefully and make sure that their essay contains all the required elements as well as meets the stated general length and citation requirements. Substantive deductions will be taken if requirements are not met. It is your responsibility to check your work to make sure your paper meets all the requirements!

Essays must be 4-6 paragraphs and roughly 600-800 words. If this base length is not met, the maximum score (prior to any deductions for missing content or errors) is the % completed. 300 words = maximum 50%. All papers must include direct citations and a works cited. Students are expected to expand their treatment of the topic and address shortcomings noted in the initial draft. Students must include screen shots of their rough draft (the essay completed in conjunction with a module mastery test or their final paper will not be graded (ZERO will be entered). Papers should resemble the original and any suspected use of generative AI of any form will result in the immediate suspension of grading and an in-person interview to assess the authenticity of the work; if authenticity cannot be demonstrated, a zero will be entered for the grade. The only software students are allowed to use is Microsoft Editor (NOT Co-pilot) to identify spelling and grammatical errors.

All essays are expected to:

a. establish a clear focus through the presence of a topic statement or thesis

b. be clear, correct, and coherent in presentation of required central content

c. be organized in presentation and clearly written

d. use the required examples to substantiate exposition and/or argument

e. cite all authors names and ideas clearly; and in revision to cite direct/indirect citations correctly and to include a works cited (MLA format)

Example of required way to integrate and cite passage and works cited:

In the text, Plato explains the purpose of his cave allegory, stating that the figure is designed to show “how far our nature is enlightened or unenlightened” (Plato 1).

Plato. “The Myth of the Cave.” Sophia Project. http://www.sophiaproject.org/uploads/1/3/9/5/13955288/plato_cave.pdf. Accessed 12 May 2021

Assignment Instructions

To complete this assignment, select a local, state, or federal policy that targets the form of oppression and discrimination you described in Week 2 (Executive Order 14096: Revitalizing Our Nation’s Commitment to Environmental Justice for All)

Then, complete the following:

Describe the purpose of a currently enacted policy that addresses the social justice problem for a chosen population, using scholarly literature for support.

Remember, this policy must be enacted—in other words, it must be passed legislation.

Describe the programs and services provided through the policy, using scholarly literature for support.

What are examples of the programs and services that are being offered as a result of your chosen policy?

Who is the target population for these programs and services?

Describe how the policy connects to the chosen social justice problem, using scholarly literature for support.

Connect the policy to the social justice problem you selected by giving a brief description of the problem. Is it a new problem, something that has recently arisen, or an old problem that has never been resolved?

Describe the historical issues and context that led to the creation of the social problem and policy development.

Include information about the voting outcomes for the policy and the legislative leaders who influenced the policy historically and in the present.

Include the impact these historical features have had on the policy’s implementation.

Guidelines

Use scholarly, peer-reviewed literature to support your claims.

Review the Policy Selection and Background rubric for information on how your work will be graded.

Remember that your instructor will be providing feedback on your assignments. Use that feedback to improve the content of your final assignment submission in Week 9, Policy Analysis and Recommendations.

Additional Requirements

The assignment you submit is expected to meet the following requirements:

Written communication: Written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message.

APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style and formatting standards.

Cited resources: A minimum of five scholarly sources. Most literature cited should be current, with publication dates within the past five years.

Length of paper: 4–6 typed, double-spaced pages.

Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.