BM632 Managing & Developing Innovation & Creativity

BM632 assignment guide highlighting innovation management concepts, creativity techniques, organisational innovation, key theories, recommended report structure, and tips for achieving higher grades.

BM632 PR1: Film presentation (10 minutes) with a written report (1200 words) Assignment Brief: Local Innovation Challenge (Individual Challenge). For BM632 Assignment, You are required to explore and propose an innovative idea that supports the growth, sustainability, or impact of a local independent organisation within your town centre. This could involve an existing small business, a charity, a not-for-profit organisation, or a completely new venture that you design.

The objective is to identify a clear gap, challenge, or unmet need within the local market and develop a creative, practical solution that demonstrates both originality and commercial or social viability. Your final submission (presentation video) should clearly communicate and “pitch” your idea, showcasing both your innovation thinking and professional communication skills.

Note: You must focus on independent organisations, local initiatives, or your own original idea. Large chains or franchises are not permitted.

What You Need to Do

Define the Opportunity Identify and clearly explain a specific local issue, customer need, or business opportunity. This may relate to:

Supporting independent local businesses through new offerings Addressing sustainability or environmental concerns Improving customer experience or accessibility Creating a new start-up concept Enhancing ethical or community-focused practices etc.  Conduct Research Support your idea with relevant evidence, including:

Secondary (desk) research such as reports, articles, or market data Primary research where appropriate (e.g. surveys, interviews, observations) This research should justify the need for your proposed solution.

Generate and Select Ideas Use creative thinking techniques to develop multiple potential solutions.

Evaluate these options and select the strongest idea based on:

Feasibility Potential impact Alignment with the identified problem/opportunity Provide clear justification for your final choice.

Apply Innovation Frameworks Demonstrate your understanding of innovation processes by applying at least one recognised model, such as:

Innovation funnel models (Tidd and Bessant, 2020) Design thinking frameworks (Utley and Klebhan, 2021) Show how your idea evolves through this process.

Use Problem-Solving Tools Incorporate appropriate techniques to analyse and refine your idea, such as:

Brainstorming or mind mapping Cause-and-effect analysis Creative modification tools (e.g. SCAMPER) Explain how these tools contributed to your development process.

Implementation Plan (12 Months) Develop a structured plan outlining how your solution could be introduced over the next year. Include:

Key milestones and stages Required resources (financial, human, physical) Stakeholder involvement and collaboration A clear timeline Strategic and Project Considerations Demonstrate your ability to think like a project manager or junior executive by including:

Basic business or operational planning Stakeholder mapping and engagement strategies Strategic considerations relevant to your idea Risk and Innovation Audit Evaluate potential risks and barriers to success. Consider:

Market demand and readiness Legal or regulatory factors Resource constraints Community acceptance or participation Suggest ways to mitigate these challenges.

1.1 Explain the phases of Management Consultancy STUDENT ASSESSMENT BRIEF: DISTANCE LEARNING Unit Number and Title:

Unit 2: Security Consultancy Process

Assessment

A security consultancy paper and a project team briefing

Assessment tasks Background information before you start Further details, a description of the organisation, its activities and its current Security Risk Management framework can be seen at Annex A and B. Please also see Annex D for Task 2. Read these first in line with this assignment as they add contextual background and important information relevant for these two tasks.

Identify situations when the organisation (Annex A & B) may find it helpful to use the services of a consultant, explaining the benefits this approach offers to the organisation, and how a consultant can add value. Consider the importance of using a consultant to help support the client’s needs and overcoming potential barriers when initiating change.

Task 1: Understanding Management Consultancy Phases and Core Skills Situation Analysis (Consultancy Report): Scenario: You work as a Security Consultant Team Leader for a UK-based NGO that operates globally, often in challenging environments.

Objective: Identify when the organisation might benefit from hiring a consultant and explain how consultants add value.

Elements to Consider Explain the phases of Management Consultancy.

Describe the skills needed for successful Management Consultancy.

Discuss strategies to overcome risks and challenges during a consultancy intervention.

Explain how security consultants enhance an organisation.

Learning outcomes and assessment criteria LO1 AC 1.1, 1.2, 1.3,1.4. Task 2: Understanding the Consultancy Life Cycle in a Security Context Project Briefing: Context: You lead a team in a Security Consultancy Project Intervention.

Client Request: The client wants a change management program to establish a security-conscious culture across the organisation.

Your Task: Create a brief analysing the consultancy life cycle that best suits the project outlined in Annex D. Show the expected deliverables at each stage.

Elements to Consider: Analyse the consultancy life cycle and its stages.

Discuss how the consultancy cycle applies in a security context.

Explain how consultancy projects are planned, controlled, and delivered.

Evaluate data sources for security consultancy projects.

Discuss effective ways to present consultancy findings and conclusions to the client.

Learning outcomes and assessment criteria LO2 AC 2.1, 2.2

LO3 AC 3.1, 3.2, 3.3

Delivery Format Deliver the brief to your team using one of the following methods:

Written document Presentation e.g. PowerPoint (with supplementary notes) Recorded presentation (with accompanying handout) Remember, the key is to meet the specified requirements while ensuring clarity and relevance.

Structure and Guidance The brief should have:

An introduction – explaining what you will cover and why

A main body covering the task contents

A summary and conclusion with recommendations for the client

The brief is to be written and delivered in a format suitable for reading by organizational management.

Information and Guidance Template – A template has been provided to assist with the structure of your written assignments. This can be found alongside this brief and should be used when completing your work.

References – All diagrams, quotations and sources of information and content are to be fully and correctly Harvard referenced.

General – The word count for task 1 should be between 1500 – 2500 words, not including your reference list, tables or figures included. Your introduction and conclusion should take approx. 10% of your word count and the rest should be balanced between the other learning outcomes. If you choose to use a written document for task 2, the above word count and guidance applies.

This is a formal piece of work that could be used by an organisation and therefore, it should be written in a way that the reader understands. No jargon or acronyms please without explaining them in full the first time you use them.

Proofread and spell-check your work. It can be helpful to ask someone else to read and check for errors before you submit.

Formatting – Your work should be 1.5 spaced and font should be in Calibri, Ariel or Times Roman, font size 12.

This assessment uses the following Unit learning outcomes: LO 1

Understand management consultancy phases and core skills

LO 2

Understand the consultancy life cycle in a security context

LO 3

Understand the management of a consultancy project

Submission details Assessment drafts should be sent to your designated tutor via email before the final version is submitted.

Once the final version is ready, the assessment should be submitted electronically. Please use the relevant submission point in the Unit area named SRMC Level 6 – Unit 2 Assignment.

Submit using the link that looks like this:

Please upload your Unit 2 assignment below for marking. Please do NOT date your assignments as your work will only be submitted for marking once all tasks are complete.

Submit your Unit 2 assignment here

Please save your Unit 2 assignment as a single word document not PDF using the naming convention:

Surname_Unit 2_SRMC 6

 

Y/N

POINTS TO CHECK – HAVE YOU?

 

Read and understood all of the Assignment Brief?

 

Read and understood the assessment criteria?

 

Met the learning outcomes and used the titles and annotations?

 

Used an academic tone throughout your work? Is your work formal, focused, and clear without slang or jargon?

 

Checked that the referencing in your work is correct?

 

Proof-read and checked your spelling and grammar?

 

Confirmed that the work submitted is your own and not plagiarised?

STUDENT ASSESSMENT BRIEF: CONTENT GUIDANCE Marketing Criteria LO1 – Understand management consultancy phases and core skills

The learner must discuss and explain situations when the organisation may require the use of a consultant. The benefits of the chosen approach must be discussed and evidenced. Reasons for the use of a consultant must include the following:

Unique solutions that reflect the circumstances and aspirations of the client.

Speed, because the consultancy team (unlike the in-house management) isn’t distracted by other tasks.

Knowledge of ‘best practice’ and effective solutions from within the client’s industrial/commercial sector. SME experience.

Exposure to expertise derived from other industries and sectors.

Provision of specific technical skills that are non-existent or in short supply in-house, and often the transfer of such skills to in-house staff.

Change management skills enhanced by the consultant’s position as independent and objective.

There are many frameworks for management consultancy. Here we are asking the learners to explain and evidence the use of the ‘phases of Management Consultancy’. It must reference the following phases and provide examples of the information the consultant would expect to gain at each stage:

Audit and scoping phase

Detailed analysis and evaluation

Implementation phase

Follow up and feedback phase

Assessment Criteria

Pass

Fail

1.1 Explain the phases of Management Consultancy

This topic is discussed clearly within the task with an appropriate degree of depth of research. The distinct phases/stages of management consultancy have been well summarised and evaluated. Each phase is broken down in detail with an appropriate amount of research to support findings which is fully referenced from reliable and current sources, with use of resources from beyond those provided in the

Unit being important. Effective use of diagrams, tables and matrices effectively explained and relevant to the task.

The topic discussed is poorly expressed with insufficient depth of referenced research and using only limited sources from the Unit pages. There is little or no clarity in evaluation.

Overused and irrelevant/poorly referenced diagrams, tables and matrices.

Referencing has not been conducted to standard and work has not been constructed in accordance with the Assignment Brief/Unit Guidance.

1.2 Describe the skills required to successfully engage in Management Consultancy

A good range of evaluation and identification of skills used to support the analysis with a focus on those required to succeed as a consultant, particularly in line with the organisation’s context (Annex A & B).

An appropriate amount of research to support findings which is fully referenced from reliable and current sources, with use of resources from beyond those provided in the Unit being important. Effective use of diagrams, tables and matrices effectively explained and relevant to the task.

Ineffective and weak evaluation of skills requirements requiring further depth of research to meet the assessment criteria.

Overused and irrelevant/poorly referenced diagrams, tables and matrices.

Referencing has not been conducted to standard and work has not been constructed in accordance with the Assignment Brief/Unit Guidance.

Use of weak references from consultancy pages on the internet

1.3 Discuss the strategies used to overcome risks and challenges which may occur during a consultancy intervention

Thorough and effective analysis and evaluation of key consultancy intervention risks, with the potential challenges that are likely to be faced identified. An appropriate amount of research to support findings which is fully referenced from reliable and current sources, with use of resources from beyond those provided in the Unit being important. A well thought out strategy for managing risks has also been well crafted with reference to the organisation (Annex A & B)

Ineffective and weak evaluation of strategy for the management of risk that will require further expansion and further depth of research to meet the assessm

Overused and irrelevant/poorly referenced diagrams, tables and matrices.

General Instructions

A minimum of 2,200 words (total assignment) and five scholarly sources. One source can be the textbook provided in the course.

Eyewitnesses
Commonwealth V Walker
https://www.apa.org/about/offices/ogc/amicus/walker

Comprehensive Feedback

1.     Provide a case where eyewitnesses proved to be inaccurate in their identification

2.     After reading the case, search the Internet for updates to the case. See if anything has happened since the case was published

3.     According to US Code 18 &3502, eyewitness testimony is admissible. Given the inaccuracy of such testimony, why is this the case?

4.     What can distort eyewitness testimony?

5.     Reference List

Instructions

Purpose

This assignment is designed to guide you in selecting and analyzing a professional journal article that provides an overview of primary science concepts. You will reflect on its relevance to your teaching practice and connect research insights to actionable strategies for classroom use.

Topics for Selection

Choose an article related to one of the following topics:

· Life Science

· Physical Science

· Earth and Space Science

· Environmental Awareness

· Health and Nutrition

Article Selection

Select an article from one of the following recommended journals, or choose a reputable journal of your choice:

· Science and Children

· Elementary STEM Journal

· Science & Education

· Teaching Children Mathematics

· Children’s Engineering Journal

· Child Care Quarterly

· Child Development

· Childhood Education

· Journal of Research in Childhood Education

· Young Children

Ensure the article aligns with one of the listed topics and offers valuable insights into teaching science concepts to young children. Attach a copy or provide a link to the article with your submission.

Report Guidelines

Your report should be 2–3 double-spaced pages, written in 12-point Times New Roman font. It must include the following sections:

1. Article Details

o Title of the article

o Author(s)

o Journal name

o Date of publication

2. Summary Provide a concise summary of the article’s main points. Highlight the key findings, ideas, or strategies discussed, and explain how the article connects to the chosen topic and its relevance to early childhood education.
3. Critique Analyze the article by evaluating its strengths and weaknesses. Share your thoughts on its usefulness, applicability, and potential impact on your understanding of teaching young children.
4. Reflection and Application In this section, reflect on the key strategies or insights from the article that resonated with you. Discuss how these strategies align with your teaching philosophy or approach. Identify specific strategies or practices from the article that you plan to implement in your future classroom. Explain why these strategies are relevant or beneficial and provide an example of how you would integrate them into a science lesson or activity to support young children’s learning and development.

 SCHOOL OF NURSING  GRADUATE STUDIES

MASTER OF SCIENCE IN NURSING – FNP

MSN6400 Advanced Practice in Primary Care

Signature Assignment

Understanding disease conditions specific to advanced primary care is vital to ensure proper and timely diagnosis and treatment to improve healthcare outcomes for the patient. The purpose of this assignment is to evaluate one disease condition in the adult population and explore current evidencebased guidelines and treatments to determine a proper plan of care.

This assignment will focus on the following course student learning outcomes (CSLO):

1. Evaluate the role of the advanced practice nurse (APN) and the Family Nurse Practitioner (FNP) in particular, as it relates to obtaining a health history, performing a health assessment on adolescents, adults, and elderly from diverse cultural groups presenting with chronic and some acute physical and emotional concerns to an ambulatory, acute and/or managed health care delivery system (EOPSLO # 1, 2, 3, 4, 9).
2. Examine the principles and theories applicable to risk assessment and primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention for the promotion of optimum health of clients experiencing chronic or multisystem health problems (EOPSLO# 3 and 8).
3. Compare and contrast the possible interrelationships and impact of demographic characteristics, health beliefs, values, family situations, environment and community resources on the incidence and management outcome of chronic and some acute conditions of adult clients (EOPSLO # 2, 6, 7, and 9)
4. Incorporate epidemiological, social, and environmental research data in the assessment, holistic planning and outcome evaluation of interventions aimed at the diagnosis and management of the adult client’s health/illness status, with emphasis on common chronic illnesses of adult individuals of diverse ethnic and cultural groups (EOPSLO # 6, 7, and 9).
5. Examine the interrelationships and influences of genetics, age, gender, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, mental health, lifestyle, family situation, culture or subculture, health beliefs and values on the differential diagnosis and selection of screening and therapeutic agents for the management of selected chronic and multisystem illnesses of adult clients, families, and groups (EOPSLO# 3, 8 and 9).
6. Synthesize the following concepts in the advanced nursing care of the client experiencing chronic multisystem illness: the advanced nurse-client relationship, client teaching-coaching function, professional role enactment, client empowerment, mutual participation in health care decision-making, ethics, client education and counseling, change theory and process, and collaboration in health care delivery (i.e., interdisciplinary, multidisciplinary, multicultural teams and global nursing) (EOPSLO # 2, 3, 4, 7, and 9).
7. Compare and contrast pharmacological and non-pharmacological/alternative therapeutic measures for the client experiencing chronic and/or multisystem diseases taking into

SCHOOL OF NURSING  GRADUATE STUDIES

MASTER OF SCIENCE IN NURSING – FNP

 

consideration pharmacotherapeutics prescriptive legal requirements for APNs and issues of polypharmacy (EOPSLO# 6, 7, and 9).

10. Utilize computer technology in synthesizing scientific and research-based knowledge regarding health care issues and problems of multicultural, multiethnic adults and populations at risk for health disparities (EOPSLO# 5, 8, and 9).

Instructions:

Please choose one global burden of disease and one population (adult, pediatric, or geriatric). Once the population is chosen, find one evidence-based technology to help support the improvement of outcomes in the global burden of disease chosen. You are to write a three-to-five-page paper in APA format 7^th edition with the following sections and level 2 headings:

*Note:

1. Paper grading is rubric-based. “Problem Statement” should NOT be used since you are not using a

PICOT question; please use “Abstract” instead.

2. Professor’s request: Use font 12-point Times New Roman.

3. All papers should have a cover, abstract, and references page; these are not included in the length of  paper.

4. The word “condition” is a general term and should be replaced by the name of the selected disorder.

Abstract

-Concise, self-contained summary of a research paper, typically 150–300 words, that outlines the purpose, methods, results, and conclusions. It acts as a standalone overview, allowing readers to quickly determine if the full paper is relevant, in this case, to the class.

Introduction (this word should not appear on the paper)

-Brief overview of the health of the population chosen

-Introduce the global burden of disease OR risk factor chosen

-Importance of improving the condition and its impact on quality of life

Global Burden of Disease Condition/Risk Factor

-Describe the disease or risk factor chosen

-What signs/symptoms are identified in the patient that can be found?

-How is it diagnosed and treated?

Technology and Healthcare

SCHOOL OF NURSING  GRADUATE STUDIES

MASTER OF SCIENCE IN NURSING – FNP

 

-Describe the paradigm shift in healthcare related to technology

-Elaborate how technology can improve health outcomes in your population

Chosen Evidence-Based Technology Use in Disease or Risk Factor

-Describe and summarize the evidence-based technology identified that has been shown to improve the condition or risk factor for the chosen patient population.

-Compare and contrast the positives and negatives of using this technology use chosen.

Conclusion

-Recap points discussed in paper using relevant information from your paper -Importance of advancements in technology

References

 

-Use reputable, peer review literature published within the last five years that is relevant to the selected topic (at least 3 references)

Writing a proposal that functions as a focus of change is a significant part of being a social worker and policy advocate. The proposal is your opportunity to use your advocacy skills to change and improve the lives of others by influencing decision makers.

For this Assignment, you write a proposal for some form of social advocacy that will seek to change a social, organizational, or legislative policy. The proposal may also involve advocacy for the amelioration of a social problem. The purpose of this assignment is to thoughtfully and thoroughly plan how you will advocate for changing a social problem or policy that is of interest to you. The policy and advocacy practice can take whatever form you wish and can be on one or more of the following levels: agency, community, or state.

 

Submit a 2- to 3-page proposal that addresses the following:

Provide a brief synopsis of the social problem you selected in Week 2.  Provide a brief synopsis of the policy you selected in Week 4.  Explain your selection of a policy—why, as a policy advocate, did you select this specific policy to promote change regarding the social problem?   Identify the person or group who enacted the policy and explain their motivation or reason for advocating for this policy. How does the reason differ from your own advocacy and change goals?  Describe the ways in which the policy impacts the populations and discuss the consequences—intended and unintended. Hint : Build on your answer to the following part of your Week 4 Assignment:  Explain how this policy affects clients you might see in a clinical setting and why, as a clinical social worker, it would be important to advocate for change. Describe your initial work to change the policy (i.e., plan for social advocacy).  Be sure to incorporate the sources you found using standard APA format.

 

Read Chapter 8 of the Jansson text.  Selected at least five sources to support your advocacy proposal. The sources may be related to specific consequences of the social problem, issues related to the policy, or steps for advocacy.

Jansson, B. S. (2018). Becoming an effective policy advocate: From policy practice to social justice  (8th ed.). Cengage Learning.  Chapter 8, “Placing Policy Proposals in Policy Briefs in the Second, Third, and Fourth Steps of Policy Analysis” (pp. 246–283)

Part III Recommended Solution and Potential Implementation Issues

This section will consist of:

The Recommend a Solution to the problem, specifically what is the recommended solution for this organization and why, support by your weighted objective and the organization’s needs, Opportunities with justification for its selection, including the potential benefit. Training Strategies Implementation Potential Implementation Issues  What are areas of concern when planning out an implementation strategy? References/Bibliography and Appendices: (5 points)

This section documents the sources used in the research report. At least 10 citations from at least seven resources must be included in APA style. This attachment includes a copy of the strategic information systems grid you developed during your research (Attachment A), as well as the comparison of solutions you considered

Patient safety and quality of care are not just concepts in a textbook—they shape what you see and experience every day in healthcare settings, the news, and even in your own or your family’s interactions with the system. This activity invites you to bridge what you are learning with real-world issues by finding and analyzing a current situation, story, or problem that directly connects to one of our key patient safety topics.

As you work through this, think about how your growing professional knowledge can help you recognize risks, propose improvements, and contribute to safer, higher-quality care.

Step 1: Choose a Topic Select ONE of the following topics as the lens for your work:

Standardization of Practices Promoting a Culture of Safety Utilizing Technology Patient Engagement Interdisciplinary Collaboration Continuous Monitoring and Improvement Preventing Healthcare-Associated Infections (HAIs) Disaster Preparedness and Emergency Response Step 2: Find a Real-World Situation Look online for a recent situation or problem that clearly relates to your chosen topic. Possible sources include:

A news article describing a safety incident or quality improvement effort A professional blog post or commentary about a healthcare challenge A video (e.g., a news clip or professional talk) describing a case or problem A case example or report you find through an online search Choose something that feels meaningful or relevant to your current or future role in healthcare.

Step 3: In no more than 500 words, create a post that includes: Brief description of the situation/problem What happened? Who was involved? What was the setting? Connection to your chosen topic Explain clearly how this situation relates to the topic (e.g., how it illustrates issues in patient engagement, technology use, or interdisciplinary collaboration). Application of the topic to the situation Use course concepts to analyze what went wrong or what went well. Propose at least two specific actions or strategies that could improve patient safety or quality in this scenario (or that explain why it was successful). Reflection on practice Briefly explain how this example shapes your thinking about your own role in promoting safety and quality.

General expectations: Demonstrate critical thinking and connection to practice Write clearly and coherently, with attention to grammar and mechanics Maintain a professional and respectful tone in all posts

ubject Code and Title HEP601 Critical Literature Review
Assessment 3 Minute in class presentation and script
Individual/Group Individual
Length 3 minute in class presentation with script (PPT notes 1000 words max +/-10%)

Learning Outcomes The Subject Learning Outcomes demonstrated by successful completion of the task below include:
a) Demonstrate information literacy and problem-solving skills to locate, gather and organise, credible and relevant resources.
b) Evaluate the quality and relevance of secondary sources related to your chosen field through critical reading.
c) Critically appraise, annotate and synthesise literature to develop a project statement for scholarly research in your chosen field.
d) Identify and distinguish between practice and theory based literature in your chosen field.
Submission Due By 11:59pm AEST/AEDT Sunday end of Week 5
Weighting 20%
Total Marks 100 marks
Assessment Task
Locate, gather and organise a range of practice and theory-based literature in your chosen field, then analyse and evaluate their interconnected topics, ideas, relationships and relevance, to develop a skeletal framework for a proposed literature review and annotated bibliography. Present in a 3 minute in class presentation. Use notes in PPT to include maximum 1000 words script.
Context
A literature review is a multi-stage process. The researcher is required to scan the available information; meticulously take notes; evaluate, synthesize, and structure the information; write a critical review of the literature; and build the list of references. The more complex the research, the more demanding the literature review process becomes. Several steps precede the task of writing the review, and a number of different approaches to organising the body of the literature review exist. Before embarking on a full-length literature review, it is prudent to determine the approach, or combination of approaches, to take.
Encountering the messy nature of knowledge while working towards the literature review can be intimidating. Concept maps can help to make sense of gathered information while conducting a literature review by visualising connecting ideas across a collection of literature or a research area. They can be used as a tool to identify additional search terms during the literature search, clarify thinking about the structure of the literature review in preparation for writing the review. They enable the researcher to better understand the theory, concepts and the relationships between concepts. 1
Instructions
This assessment has three parts:

1. Concept map
2. Outline of the proposed topic and research project area
3. Literature framework tables with 10-15 key seminal papers
   This assessment will also form the basis for the work you will undertake in Assessment 2.
4. Concept Map (visual)
   Concept Maps are graphic representations of topics, ideas, and their relationships. They allow users to group information (such as research sources) in related modules so that the connections between and among the literature become more readily apparent than they might from an examination of a list. See an example of concept map below:

Follow the steps below to complete this part (1) of the Assessment.
I. Identify an area of research that interests you, which you would like to explore further. This could be inspired by an existing problem or simply be driven by a curiosity and desire to contribute to the existing body of knowledge in the field.
II. Locate and gather a range of practice and theory-based literature focussed around your selected area of research.
III. Evaluate the literature sources for their relevance to your area of research.
IV. Conduct an analysis of the literature, in order to understand the interconnected topics, ideas and relationships, these are known as emergent themes.
V. Determine an appropriate approach, or combination of approaches, for organising the literature to highlight key concepts.
VI. Create a concept map of the literature that logically visualises the connecting topics, ideas, and relationships; and highlights the important themes, potential debates and existing gaps in the body of knowledge.
2. Outline of the Literature Review
Create a skeletal framework of the proposed literature review that outlines the structure, and defines the scope and focus of the proposed literature review.
In your outline present the following information:
● The literature search strategies applied (be as detailed and specific as possible, as this is the basis on which your mentor or learning facilitator can check if you are looking at the literature correctly)
● Group the articles and briefly discuss them in the context of the basis on which they were grouped (Chronological, Methodological, Thematic or Theoretical, or some combination thereof).
● Develop a table of citations and literature (recommend approximately 10-20 papers with coverage in 4 themes/streams.
3. Literature Framework Table and annotations
Include a minimum of 10-15 annotations of significant works in the literature that are driving your research project area and topic in your literature framework table. This is an evolving document, and you should continue to update it through your research process, maybe even after this course – if applicable.
An annotation may contain all or part of the following elements depending on the content of the sources you are examining. You must include as many of these elements as are relevant for your source. These can be developed to the headings in your table.
● Bibliographic citation.
● author(s).
● scope of the research/paper.
● Key argument.
● The research methods if applicable.
● Conclusions made by the author/s.
● Strengths and limitations of the text.
● Gaps in knowledge needing exploration.
Please refer to the Assessment Rubric for details on how your submission will be assessed.
Your presentation slides may include the following slides:

1. Search process
2. Literature framework table and annotation 10-15 seminal references
3. Concept map visual
4. Gaps and directions that need to be researched
5. Project title and topic area for approval
   Referencing
   The references list should contain the sources of information you used and cited in your paper. Only include those cited in the text (this is not a bibliography) but include every citation.
   It is essential that you use appropriate APA style for citing and referencing research. Please see more information on referencing in the Academic Skills webpage.
   Submission Instructions
   Submit your Assessment 1 Concept Map, Outline of the Literature Review and Annotated Bibliography using the following naming convention: HEP601_First name_Family name_Assessment 1.pdf. Submit your report via the Assessment link in MyLearn. Your Learning Facilitator will provide a mark and feedback via the MyMarks

Academic Integrity
All students are responsible for ensuring that all work submitted is their own and is appropriately referenced and academically written according to the Academic Writing Guide. Students also need to have read and be aware of Torrens University Australia Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure and subsequent penalties for academic misconduct. These are viewable online.
Students also must keep a copy of all submitted material and any assessment drafts.
/dŽŽůƐʹ^ƚĂƚĞŵĞŶƚŽĨĐŬŶŽǁůĞĚŐĞŵĞŶƚ dŽƌƌĞŶƐhŶŝǀĞƌƐŝƚLJƵƐƚƌĂůŝĂƌĞƋƵŝƌĞƐĂůůƐƚƵĚĞŶƚƐƚŽƐƵďŵŝƚĂŶƌƚŝĨŝĐŝĂů/ŶƚĞůůŝŐĞŶĐĞ ;/Ϳ^ƚĂƚĞŵĞŶƚŽĨĐŬŶŽǁůĞĚŐĞŵĞŶƚǁŝƚŚĞǀĞƌLJĂƐƐĞƐƐŵĞŶƚ͘/ĨLJŽƵŚĂǀĞƵƐĞĚ/ƚŽŽůƐ͕ LJŽƵŵƵƐƚĐůĞĂƌůLJĚĞƐĐƌŝďĞŚŽǁƚŚĞLJǁĞƌĞƵƐĞĚ͘/ĨLJŽƵŚĂǀĞŶŽƚƵƐĞĚĂŶLJ/ƚŽŽůƐ͕LJŽƵ ŵƵƐƚƐƚĂƚĞƚŚŝƐĐůĞĂƌůLJŝŶLJŽƵƌĂĐŬŶŽǁůĞĚŐĞŵĞŶƚ͘WůĞĂƐĞƌĞĨĞƌƚŽƚŚĞ^ƚĂƚĞŵĞŶƚŽĨ ĐŬŶŽǁůĞĚŐĞŵĞŶƚƚĞŵƉůĂƚĞĂŶĚƚŚĞdŽƌƌĞŶƐhŶŝǀĞƌƐŝƚLJ>ŝďƌĂƌLJĨŽƌĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂů
ŐƵŝĚĂŶĐĞŽŶƚŚĞĂƉƉƌŽƉƌŝĂƚĞƵƐĞŽĨ/