Rationale You have to demonstrate that you have learned and understood the development process, along with the key principles and layout designs of all areas and operations that comprise a new hospitality facility. Task Description Prepare a 20 minutes presentation which outlines the key design requirements to develop a new hospitality facility. Focus on the audience of the presentation, the potential investors. Task instructions You are required to develop a power point presentation which must be supported by a list of references at the end of the presentation. It should follow the project proposal format and content (assignment 2), and should explain in detail the concept and characteristics of the new hospitality facility. Submit your document are a PowerPoint. In your group, you need to decide which of your ideas, would be best to pitch to possible investors. Resources References used in the lectures. Referencing style Include a minimum of five academic sources and five websites of organisations and/or corporations. References need to follow SCU Harvard Style Referencing . Task submission To submit your project proposal, follow the link assessments 3 in the blackboard. Submit in the Turnitin link provided.

Written Assignment 1 – Instructions

Due: After you have completed Unit 6

Weight: Three written memos (10% of overall course grade)

Assignment 1 requires you to upload (as a single document) the memos you produced in the following learning activities:

Learning Activity 1.4: Selecting an Organization to Study (for context, not marking). Learning Activity 2.4: Legal Analysis Learning Activity 2.5: Hazard Assessment Learning Activity 3.4: Workflow Analysis Learning Activity 3.5: Job Analysis Learning Activity 3.6: Job Description and Job Specification Learning Activity 4.4: Labour Demand Forecast Learning Activity 4.5: Internal Labour Supply Forecast Learning Activity 4.6: Gap Analysis and HR Objectives Learning Activity 5.4: Recruitment Strategy Learning Activity 5.5: Job Posting and Advertisement Learning Activity 6.4: Candidate Screen Process Learning Activity 6.5: Candidate Selection Process Learning Activity 6.6: Interview Questions Once you have created and uploaded the document, three things will happen:

Your tutor will review your submission to ensure that all the required memos are present. If there are missing memos or any of your memos lack citation, your submission will be returned to you for revision. Your tutor will select three memos to grade against each of their marking rubrics. These marked memos will be returned to you. Once you have received your marked memos back, you will contact your tutor to set up a time for a 20-minute oral quiz. During this oral quiz, your tutor will ask you questions about the three memos that were selected for grading. The questions are similar to the “As your write your memo, consider these questions” and are designed to probe the thinking that went into the creation of the memos. You may consult the memos and any other notes you have during the quiz

Rationale You have to demonstrate that you have learned and understood the development process, along with the key principles and layout designs of all areas and operations that comprise a new hospitality facility. Task Description Prepare a 20 minutes presentation which outlines the key design requirements to develop a new hospitality facility. Focus on the audience of the presentation, the potential investors. Task instructions You are required to develop a power point presentation which must be supported by a list of references at the end of the presentation. It should follow the project proposal format and content (assignment 2), and should explain in detail the concept and characteristics of the new hospitality facility. Submit your document are a PowerPoint. In your group, you need to decide which of your ideas, would be best to pitch to possible investors. Resources References used in the lectures. Referencing style Include a minimum of five academic sources and five websites of organisations and/or corporations. References need to follow SCU Harvard Style Referencing . Task submission To submit your project proposal, follow the link assessments 3 in the blackboard. Submit in the Turnitin link provided.

CMP212 Object Oriented Programming Assessment 2 Brief 2026 | Elizabeth

CMP212 Assessment 2 Brief

Programme Title	FdSc Computing
Module Title	Object Oriented Programming
Module Code	CMP212
Assessment Type	Practical
Submission Deadline	26/06/2026 – 04:00PM
Weight	70%
Prepared By	Akira Agusta

Module Aims

This module further develops the programming abilities of students by introducing them to object oriented programming (OOP) concepts such as classes, objects, encapsulation, inheritance and polymorphism.

Learning Outcomes Assessed

No	Learning Outcomes
LO2	Design an object oriented application.
LO3	Distinguish and apply appropriate object oriented programming methodologies to create an application.

Description/Guidance

Assessment	Practical
Weight	70% Marks
Submission Method	Turnitin – Zip file including code, and You Tube video link

Basic Guidelines

You have been employed as a junior developer and have been given your first assignment. You will be helping to develop a Java application for the Newcastle Philatelist Club (NPC) who require a system for their members to organise stamps that they either own or are interested in.

You have been tasked with the design and development of a prototype application that meets the requirements outlined below and displays data using in-memory objects (non-permanent data storage) or that utilises comma-separated values (CSV) files to store data (permanent storage).

You are required to build a prototype application that meets the requirements below and demonstrates your ability to use OOP techniques.

Programme Application Requirements

1.Application compiles and displays a GUI, with views for:
a.Main Menu (application homepage)
b.Manage Stamps (loads the different stamp categories. Available categories are: Definitive, Commemorative, Used and Mint.)
c.Stamp ownership (allow users to organize their stamps into available categories)
d.Stamps wishlist (allow users to manage a list of stamps they wish to own)
2.Application displays data relevant to the views
3.Application allows multiple users to log in and store personalised ownership lists and wishlists (but all users have access to the same list of Stamps and Stamp Categories)
4.Application users cannot add, edit, or delete any of the categories in 1b
5.Application allows users to:
a.Add a new data item on views 1c and 1d
b.Edit a data item on views 1c and 1d
c.Delete a data item on views 1c and 1d

Buy Answer of CMP212 Object Oriented Programming Assessment 2

Chat With Experts

Additional Notes

You should plan your classes before you begin working on your application. You will be shown how to use the Unified Modelling Language (UML) to create a class diagram that highlights relationships between classes. You should also employ OOP concepts where possible.

On completion of your application, you are asked to create a video screen-recording of yourself (no more than 20 minutes) using the application and talking through its functionality. Your video should demonstrate how you have fulfilled each of the

requirements, starting from 1 to 5. You should upload this to YouTube as an unlisted video and provide a link for submission.

Assessment Criteria

Weight (%) Criteria

Weight (%)	Criteria
25%	Functionality and Requirement Fulfilment
25%	User Experience and Interface Design
25%	Code Quality and Efficiency
25%	Data Management and External Handling

Learning and Teaching Strategies

Our philosophy of learning and teaching, our understanding of teaching for level 5 and NCG policies and strategies have all influenced our specific approach to learning and teaching for the level 5. Our teaching methods have been developed with explicit attention to debates pertaining to student learning styles. As such, our teaching methods provide a framework via which students develop the capacity to manage their own learning and evolve, over the course of their studies, into independent learners, acquiring the knowledge, understanding and skills that are essential to learning in Higher Education and to lifelong learning, post-graduation. Lectures, tutorials, and student-centred learning exercises will be employed. Practical sessions will support the learning of abstract concepts. Workshops and demonstrations will be organised in different topics to help the students master the necessary skills to develop their knowledge in these areas. Wherever possible, reference will be made to additional material and academic journals in the relevant field of computing. The VLE will be used to augment face to face teaching and learning with additional opportunities for learning and access to resources. There will be an introduction to the use of the library and a supportive tutorial framework to give individual support where required.

Learning Materials/Resources

Books

• Lassoff, M (2017) Java programming for beginners, Packt Publishing
• Martin, R (2018) Clean Architecture, Pearson Education
• Schildt, H (2017) Java: The Complete Reference (10th Ed.), McGraw-Hill
• Urma, R., Fusco, M. and Mycroft, A (2018) Modern Java in Action (2nd Ed.),

Manning Publications

Websites

• Java Tutorial (w3schools.com)
• Java Tutorial | Learn Java Programming – java point
• Java Tutorial – GeeksforGeeks
• Java Tutorial (tutorialspoint.com)
• Learn Java Programming (programiz.com)

Contextualised Grading Criteria – Practical (70% Weighting)

Criteria	Grade	Description
Exceptional	90% – 100%	· Requirements 1 – 5 fully functional and exceptional extensions are there. · Application uses dynamic data and has implemented permanent storage via CSV. · GUI is intuitive and exceptionally designed. · Code is clean and exceptionally organized. · Exceptional evidence of OOP application throughout the work (inheritance, encapsulation, abstraction and polymorphism).
Outstanding	80% – 89%	· Requirements 1 – 5 fully functional. · Application uses dynamic data and has implemented permanent storage via CSV. · GUI is intuitive and outstanding. · Code is clean and commented. · Outstanding evidence of OOP application throughout the work (inheritance, encapsulation, abstraction and polymorphism).
Excellent	70% – 79%	· Requirements 1 – 5 fully functional. · Application uses dynamic data and has implemented permanent storage via CSV. · GUI is intuitive and well designed. · Code is clean and well organized. · Clear evidence of OOP application throughout the work (inheritance, encapsulation, abstraction and polymorphism).
Good	60% – 69%	· Requirements 1, 2, 4 and 5 fully functional. · Application uses hard-coded, static data. · GUI is suitable for the requirements though with some issues. · Code is generally clean and well organized. · Generally, very good evidence of OOP application throughout the work (inheritance, encapsulation, abstraction and polymorphism) though with some minor areas requiring additional work.
Average	50% – 59%	· Requirements 1, 2 and 5 fully functional, with partial completion of requirement 3 and/or 4. · Application uses hard-coded, static data. · GUI is mostly well designed with some minor issues. · Code is generally well organized. · Sound evidence of OOP application throughout the work (inheritance, encapsulation, abstraction and polymorphism) though with some areas requiring additional work.
Satisfactory	40% – 49%	· Requirements 1 and any other 2 attempted with some partial completion. · Application uses hard-coded, static data. · GUI is adequately designed.

		· Code is complete but may not be well organized. · Some evidence of OOP application throughout the work (inheritance, encapsulation, abstraction and polymorphism) though with many areas requiring additional work.
Unsatisfactory	30% – 39%	Knowledge and understanding at a limited level. There may be errors in either factual knowledge or understanding. Expression of ideas is not always clear, with ideas/arguments/discussions weakly structured. Practical application may be only partially complete or have glaring omissions or errors. To achieve a grade of 30% or more, a genuine attempt at the assessment criteria must be demonstrated.
Unsatisfactory	0% – 29%	Knowledge and understanding at an extremely limited level. There may be significant errors and/or omissions both in factual knowledge and understanding. Practical application may be extremely limited or not present at all.

4BU016 Sustainable Business CW Report Assignment Brief Semester 1 and 2 2026 | UOW

Assignment Brief 4BU016 Sustainable Business 25/26

Topic	Detail
Academic year / semester	2025/2026 Semester 1 and 2
Module code and title	4BU016 The Sustainable Business
Module Leader	Katie Brookes katie.brookes@wlv.ac.uk
Assignment name	Coursework
Assignment type	Report
Assignment weighting and size	100% 3000 words (+/-10%)
Assessment unpacking video location	Modules > Assessment > Assessment Information
‘What’s my assignment?’ unpacking date	Week 1 repeated week 4.
Formative submission date	See Canvas front page
Formative submission method	Upload to Canvas- see Assignment Tab in Canvas for details
Formative feedback date	To be discussed in class
Summative (i.e., final) submission date	See Canvas front page and Assignment Tab
Summative submission method	Online in Canvas
Assignment requirements	This assessment requires you to choose ANY ONE of the following United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, you will then choose ANY ONE for-profit organisation and provide detailed information of your chosen organisations sustainability practice(s) in relation to the selected theme.
The assessment requires you to choose ANY ONE of the following themes from the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals and write a 3000-word report. The United Nations Sustainable Development Goals can be accessed here: https://sdgs.un.org/goals  Theme 1: Affordable and Clean Energy (Goal 7) Theme 2: Decent Work and Economic Growth (Goal 8) Theme 3: Sustainable Cities and Communities (Goal 11) Theme 4: Responsible Consumption and Production (Goal 12) Theme 5: Climate Action (Goal 13) Theme 6: Life Below Water (Goal 14) The 3000-word report should include the following: A. Executive summary (300 words) – This is not included in the word count.              For the executive summary, you will provide a brief snapshot of the entire report. This should include:               – A brief introduction of the chosen theme (100 words)               – A brief introduction of the chosen organisation, it’s sustainability vision and mission (150 words)               – Sustainability theories used (50 words) B. Introduction to Sustainability theme (600 words) For this section, you will provide an overview of the chosen sustainability theme. This should include: – Brief description of the theme (150 words) – Key issues associated with the theme and its impact across the globe (450 words) C. Organisation (1000 words) For this section, you will choose any one for-profit organisation and provide detailed information of your chosen organisations’ sustainability practice(s) in relation to the selected theme. This should include: – Sustainability actions/practices that the organisation adopts to resolve the issues you identified for the chosen theme (500 words) – How the noted sustainability practices(s) impact the social(people), environmental(planet) and economic(profit) performance (500 words) D. Exploration of theory (1000 words) – For this section, you will select at least two models (in relation to the business functions) that can support your chosen organisation and resolve issues you identified as part of the chosen theme. This should include: – A brief description of selected model E.g., sustainable marketing or sustainable HR or sustainable finance or sustainable supply chain management. (300 words) – Clear justification of how the research gathered can add further value in supporting the organisation to resolve issues in relation to chosen theme (700 words) E. Recommendation (400 words) Based on your findings from theory, provide recommendations on how your chosen organisation can improve or develop their sustainability practices.  Proposed report structure:  1. Front page Include student number, chosen theme and module tutor name.  2. Executive summary (300 words) – This is not included in the word count. 3. Name of chosen theme (600 words) 4. Name of chosen organisation (1000 words 5. Exploration of theory (1000 words) 6. Recommendation (400 words) 7. Reference List 8. Appendices  Further instructions: – Please start each section on a new page – Use font size 11, font – Arial or Calibri
Learning outcomes	LO1- Demonstrate an understanding of sustainability within a range of business environments. LO2- Demonstrate an understanding of the Triple Bottom Line. LO3- Develop a sustainability plan for an organisation.
Assessment criteria (see rubric below for performance criteria)	· Exploration of sustainability theme/concepts- 20%. · Assessment of sustainability practice and its impact- 30%. · Theoretical analysis of sustainability concepts- 30%. · Recommendations- 10%. · Academic writing, references, clear and cohesive report- 10%.
Characteristics of a good submission	Shows understanding of the chosen theme. Clear knowledge for the chosen organisation including its current sustainability practice(s). Analyse at least two theoretical concepts that support the organisation and theme. Provide a number of recommendations appropriate for the organisation. Use books and journal articles to support your work as well as a range of wider reading.
Additional instructions	Reference list and appendices are NOT included in the word count. Always keep a copy of your drafts and a file of working documents. There may be circumstances – for example, if there are questions relating to the academic integrity of your work – where you may be asked to submit the evidence of your work and meet with your tutor to answer questions about your submission.
Professional Body requirements	(If applicable)
University regulations	University’s Academic Regulations Academic Integrity Policy Level and Mark Descriptors
Support	Student Support and Wellbeing Study Guides Skills for Learning – Introduction to Academic Study Skills Academic English Language Skills You should also refer to your Course and Module Guides
Date by which feedback will be provided	Within the University of Wolverhampton current guidelines.
Feedback format	Written feedback on Canvas
Resit details	The Resit requirement for this assignment is to provide a rework of the original submission, with additions and amendments highlighted, to indicate where you have applied the feedback received. The resit will be due in the resit period and the actual date will be available on Canvas approximately 6 weeks after the submission for the first assessment submission.

Are You Looking Answer for GMGT 5173 Organisational Behaviour Assignment?

Request to Buy Answer

Report criteria	80-100%  Work of an excellent standard	70-79%  Work of a very good standard	60-69%  Work of a good standard.	50-59%  Work of a satisfactory standard.	40-49%  Work of a pass standard.	0-39%  FAIL
Exploration of sustainability theme/concepts (20%)	The work demonstrates excellent exploration of chosen sustainability theme, underpinning the value and key components of the theme. A balanced, excellently structured piece of work that is consistent and demonstrates an excellent understanding of concepts within the theme.	The work demonstrates very good exploration of chosen sustainability theme, underpinning the value and key components of the theme. A balanced, very well- structured piece of work that is consistent and demonstrates a very good understanding of concepts within the theme.	The work demonstrates good exploration of chosen sustainability theme, underpinning the value and key components of the theme. A well- structured piece of work that is mostly consistent and demonstrates an overall good understanding of concepts within the theme.	The work demonstrates satisfactory exploration of chosen sustainability theme, underpinning some values and key components of the theme. A satisfactorily structured piece of work that is consistent in parts and demonstrates satisfactory understanding of concepts within the theme. Possible diversions from chosen theme of discussion	The work demonstrates a fair exploration of chosen sustainability theme, only partially underpinning values and key components of the theme. The work diverges from chosen theme in parts and demonstrates inconsistencies in understanding of key concepts within the theme.	The work fails to explore the chosen sustainability theme, thus failing to meet the assessment criteria. Uses inaccurate or inappropriate content to explore the chosen sustainability theme and/or completely diverges from selected theme and its underpinning concepts
Assessment of sustainability practices and for selected organisation and its impact on 3Ps (30%)	Excellent assessment of sustainability practices of the selected organisation in line with the chosen theme. The correlation between the theme, sustainability practice(s) and its impact on 3Ps is presented at an excellent standard.	Very good assessment of sustainability practices of the selected organisation in line with the chosen theme. The correlation between the theme, sustainability practice(s) and its impact on 3Ps is presented at a very good standard. .	Good assessment of sustainability practices of the selected organisation in line with the chosen theme. The correlation between the theme, sustainability practice(s) and its impact on 3Ps is presented mostly at a good standard.	Satisfactory assessment of sustainability practices of the selected organisation mostly in line with the chosen theme. Possible diversion from chosen theme. The correlation between the theme, sustainability practice(s) and its impact on 3Ps is presented at a satisfactory standard with some inconsistencies.	Partial assessment of sustainability practices of the selected organisation in relation to chosen theme. Possible diversion from chosen theme or partial information presented. The correlation between the chosen theme, sustainability practice(s) and its impact on 3Ps is presented at a fair standard but demonstrates frequent inconsistencies.	The work fails to clearly assess the sustainability practices of the selected organisation, or the assessment is mostly inaccurate. The work lacks coherence between chosen theme, sustainability practice(s) and its impact on 3Ps, thus failing to meet the assignment criteria.
Theoretical analysis of sustainability concepts (30%)	Strong evidence of wider reading (beyond sources shared on Canvas) of sustainability theory and literature from credible sources. Excellent appraisal of appropriate theory around chosen theme. Excellent analysis of how theory aligns with sustainability practices of selected organisation.	Very good evidence of wider reading (beyond sources shared on Canvas) of sustainability theory and literature from credible sources. Very good appraisal of appropriate theory around chosen theme. Very good analysis of how theory aligns with sustainability practices of selected organisation.	Good evidence of reading of sustainability theory and literature from credible sources. Appraisal of appropriate theory around chosen theme is mostly good. Analysis of how theory aligns with sustainability practices of selected organisation is mostly good.

Please answer all three questions in the case study. Must be authentic. At  least 1200 words.

 Case Study 

Jordan is a team leader at a marketing agency responsible for overseeing a group of eight employees. Over the past three years, Jordan has developed a close friendship with one of the team members, Alex. They regularly have lunch together, socialize outside of work, and their families have become friends. While Jordan tries to remain professional at work, other team members have noticed that Jordan often gives Alex more flexibility with deadlines and is less critical of Alex’s work than that of other employees.

One month before a major product launch for a key client, Alex was responsible for reviewing and approving a large portion of the campaign materials. Due to an oversight, Alex failed to identify several significant errors in the content before it was released to the client. The mistakes caused the client to lose confidence in the agency and ultimately terminate its contract, resulting in a substantial financial loss. The incident also delayed several other projects as the team scrambled to address the fallout.

Senior management quickly became involved and requested a formal investigation into what happened. Jordan is expected to provide an objective assessment of Alex’s role in the mistake and recommend any necessary corrective actions. However, Jordan is concerned that disciplining Alex could damage their friendship. At the same time, other team members are watching closely and expect Jordan to hold Alex accountable just as any other employee would be.

As pressure from senior management increases, Jordan must decide how to handle the situation while balancing personal relationships, fairness, team morale, and professional responsibilities.

 

As you reflect on Jordan’s situation, we invite you to share your perspective on the following — and where relevant, draw on the chapter readings to support your responses: 

Opening Questions:

1.      How should Jordan handle the concern of upper management while protecting their credibility?

2.      How should Jordan handle the oversight made by his friend/employee and the scrutiny the rest of the team is imposing?

3.      Have you ever been in a situation similar to this, whether you’ve been the leader, the friend/employee, or a team member watching the situation unfold? If so,

·        How was this handled, and what decisions/actions did you take in your role?

·        Do you feel your feelings influenced your actions/decisions?

·        Do you feel your actions/decisions were effective and/or influenced the team in either a positive or negative manner?

 

Additional Reading/Support Articles 

Emotional Intelligence and Leadership – https://escp.eu/news/emotional-intelligence-leadership

Employee Happiness and Performance – https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10372227/

Emotions and Leadership – https://www.harvardbusiness.org/insight/from-emotional-triggers-to-values-based-leadership-a-practical-framework/

Charismatic Leadership – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_3hSmaOhGWU

Social Identity Theory – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1ucEExrCNk

ASSIGNMENT 3

Make a quality initiative proposal (7 PowerPoint slides) through a presentation, interpreting and communicating dashboard data to support the proposal.

Introduction:

Health care providers are perpetually striving to improve care quality and patient safety. To accomplish enhanced care, outcomes need to be measured. Next, data measures must be validated. Measurement and validation of information support performance improvement. Health care providers must focus attention on evidence-based best practices to improve patient outcomes.

Health informatics, along with new and improved technologies and procedures, are at the core of all quality improvement initiatives. Data analysis begins with provider documentation, researched process improvement models, and recognized quality benchmarks. All of these items work together to improve patient outcomes. Professional nurses must be able to interpret and communicate dashboard information that displays critical care metrics and outcomes along with data collected from the care delivery process.

Overview:

A basic principle of quality measurement is: If you can’t measure it, you can’t improve it.–Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (2021)

In the previous assessment, you analyzed the effectiveness of an existing quality initiative. Now that you’ve done that, this assessment gives you experience interpreting and communicating dashboard data for the purpose of making a quality initiative proposal of your own. And you’ll make your proposal through a PowerPoint presentation, including using speaker notes in the Notes section of the slides, much like you might in your health care setting.

Health care providers are on an endless quest to improve both care quality and patient safety. This unwavering commitment requires hospitals and care givers to increase their attention and adherence to treatment protocols to improve patient outcomes. Health informatics, along with new and improved technologies and procedures, are at the core of virtually all QI initiatives. The data gathered by providers, along with process improvement models and recognized quality benchmarks, are all part of a collaborative, continuing effort. As such, it is essential that professional nurses are able to correctly interpret and effectively communicate information revealed on dashboards that display critical care metrics.

INSTRUCTIONS:

In this assessment, you will make a QI initiative proposal based on a health issue of professional interest to you. This proposal will be based on an analysis of dashboard metrics from a health care facility. You have two options:

Option 1

If you have access to dashboard metrics related to a QI initiative proposal of interest to you:

•            Analyze data from the health care facility to identify a health care issue or an area of concern. You will need access to reports and data related to care quality and patient safety. If you work in a hospital setting, contact the quality management department to obtain the data you need.

◦          You will need to identify basic information about the health care setting, size, and specific type of care delivery related to the topic that you identify. You are expected to abide by standards for compliance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA).

Option 2

If you do not have access to a dashboard or metrics related to a QI initiative proposal:

•            You may use one of the links in the following reading list to access a dashboard or metrics for a health care facility to develop the QI initiative proposal:

◦          Assessment 3: Resources

•            You will follow the same instructions and provide the same deliverables as your peers who select Option 1.

Complete the following steps for your proposal:

•            Analyze data to identify a health care issue or an area of concern as it relates to a state, national, or accreditation benchmark requirement relevant to your professional setting.

◦          Evaluate the quality of the data.

•            Outline a QI initiative proposal based on the selected health issue or area of concern and supporting data analysis to improve identified dashboard metric. The interactive activity Designing a Quality Improvement Initiative can get you going on the first steps of a QI process and your assessment.

◦          Identify the target areas of improvement and outcome measures.

◦          Include the QI model that will be utilized.

◦          Specify evidence-based strategies that will be utilized.

•            Integrate interprofessional perspectives and actions to lead quality improvements in patient safety, cost-effectiveness, and work-life quality.

◦          Specify roles and responsibilities.

•            Apply effective collaboration strategies to promote QI of interprofessional care.

◦          Include specific communication tools.

•            Deliver a persuasive, coherent, and effective audiovisual presentation. Integrate relevant sources to support arguments, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style.

Be sure that your proposal, at minimum, addresses each of the bullet points. You may also want to read the Data Analysis and Quality Improvement Initiative Proposal Scoring Guide to better understand the performance levels that relate to each grading criterion. Additionally, be sure to review the Guiding Questions: Data Analysis and Quality Improvement Initiative Proposal [DOCX] document for additional clarification about things to consider when creating your assessment.

ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS:

Your assessment should also meet the following requirements:

•            Length of submission: 7 PowerPoint slides, with speaker’s notes, not including title slide and attached reference list. Balance text with visuals. Avoid text-heavy slides. Use speaker’s notes for additional content.

•            Length of presentation: No more than 10 minutes.

•            What to submit: Along with your recording, submit your slides with speaker notes as a PDF. Save your PowerPoint files as a PDF with notes. The speaker notes will be processed through Turnitin.

•            Number of references: Cite a minimum of five sources (no older than seven years, unless a seminal work) of scholarly or professional evidence to support your evaluation, recommendations, and plans. Review the Nursing Master’s Program (MSN) Library Guide for guidance.

•            APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style. Review the Evidence and APA section of the Writing Center for guidance.

 

COMPETENCIES MEASURED:

 

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

•            Competency 2: Plan quality improvement initiatives in response to routine data surveillance.

◦          Analyze data to identify a health care issue or area of concern as it relates to a state, national, or accreditation benchmark requirement.

◦          Outline a quality improvement initiative proposal based on a selected health care issue or area of concern and supporting data analysis to improve identified dashboard metrics.

•            Competency 4: Integrate interprofessional perspectives to lead quality improvements in patient safety, cost-effectiveness, and work-life quality.

◦          Integrate interprofessional perspectives and specify actions to lead quality improvements in patient safety, cost-effectiveness, and work-life quality.

•            Competency 5: Apply effective communication strategies to promote quality improvement of interprofessional care.

◦          Apply effective collaboration strategies to promote quality improvement of interprofessional care.

◦          Create a persuasive, coherent, and effective audiovisual presentation. Integrate relevant sources to support arguments, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style.

Reference

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2021). Preventing falls in hospitals. https://www.ahrq.gov/patient-safety/settings/hospital/fall-prevention/toolkit/index.html

ASSIGNMENT 3

Make a quality initiative proposal (7 PowerPoint slides) through a presentation, interpreting and communicating dashboard data to support the proposal.

Introduction:

Health care providers are perpetually striving to improve care quality and patient safety. To accomplish enhanced care, outcomes need to be measured. Next, data measures must be validated. Measurement and validation of information support performance improvement. Health care providers must focus attention on evidence-based best practices to improve patient outcomes.

Health informatics, along with new and improved technologies and procedures, are at the core of all quality improvement initiatives. Data analysis begins with provider documentation, researched process improvement models, and recognized quality benchmarks. All of these items work together to improve patient outcomes. Professional nurses must be able to interpret and communicate dashboard information that displays critical care metrics and outcomes along with data collected from the care delivery process.

Overview:

A basic principle of quality measurement is: If you can’t measure it, you can’t improve it.–Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (2021)

In the previous assessment, you analyzed the effectiveness of an existing quality initiative. Now that you’ve done that, this assessment gives you experience interpreting and communicating dashboard data for the purpose of making a quality initiative proposal of your own. And you’ll make your proposal through a PowerPoint presentation, including using speaker notes in the Notes section of the slides, much like you might in your health care setting.

Health care providers are on an endless quest to improve both care quality and patient safety. This unwavering commitment requires hospitals and care givers to increase their attention and adherence to treatment protocols to improve patient outcomes. Health informatics, along with new and improved technologies and procedures, are at the core of virtually all QI initiatives. The data gathered by providers, along with process improvement models and recognized quality benchmarks, are all part of a collaborative, continuing effort. As such, it is essential that professional nurses are able to correctly interpret and effectively communicate information revealed on dashboards that display critical care metrics.

INSTRUCTIONS:

In this assessment, you will make a QI initiative proposal based on a health issue of professional interest to you. This proposal will be based on an analysis of dashboard metrics from a health care facility. You have two options:

Option 1

If you have access to dashboard metrics related to a QI initiative proposal of interest to you:

•            Analyze data from the health care facility to identify a health care issue or an area of concern. You will need access to reports and data related to care quality and patient safety. If you work in a hospital setting, contact the quality management department to obtain the data you need.

◦          You will need to identify basic information about the health care setting, size, and specific type of care delivery related to the topic that you identify. You are expected to abide by standards for compliance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA).

Option 2

If you do not have access to a dashboard or metrics related to a QI initiative proposal:

•            You may use one of the links in the following reading list to access a dashboard or metrics for a health care facility to develop the QI initiative proposal:

◦          Assessment 3: Resources

•            You will follow the same instructions and provide the same deliverables as your peers who select Option 1.

Complete the following steps for your proposal:

•            Analyze data to identify a health care issue or an area of concern as it relates to a state, national, or accreditation benchmark requirement relevant to your professional setting.

◦          Evaluate the quality of the data.

•            Outline a QI initiative proposal based on the selected health issue or area of concern and supporting data analysis to improve identified dashboard metric. The interactive activity Designing a Quality Improvement Initiative can get you going on the first steps of a QI process and your assessment.

◦          Identify the target areas of improvement and outcome measures.

◦          Include the QI model that will be utilized.

◦          Specify evidence-based strategies that will be utilized.

•            Integrate interprofessional perspectives and actions to lead quality improvements in patient safety, cost-effectiveness, and work-life quality.

◦          Specify roles and responsibilities.

•            Apply effective collaboration strategies to promote QI of interprofessional care.

◦          Include specific communication tools.

•            Deliver a persuasive, coherent, and effective audiovisual presentation. Integrate relevant sources to support arguments, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style.

Be sure that your proposal, at minimum, addresses each of the bullet points. You may also want to read the Data Analysis and Quality Improvement Initiative Proposal Scoring Guide to better understand the performance levels that relate to each grading criterion. Additionally, be sure to review the Guiding Questions: Data Analysis and Quality Improvement Initiative Proposal [DOCX] document for additional clarification about things to consider when creating your assessment.

ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS:

Your assessment should also meet the following requirements:

•            Length of submission: 7 PowerPoint slides, with speaker’s notes, not including title slide and attached reference list. Balance text with visuals. Avoid text-heavy slides. Use speaker’s notes for additional content.

•            Length of presentation: No more than 10 minutes.

•            What to submit: Along with your recording, submit your slides with speaker notes as a PDF. Save your PowerPoint files as a PDF with notes. The speaker notes will be processed through Turnitin.

•            Number of references: Cite a minimum of five sources (no older than seven years, unless a seminal work) of scholarly or professional evidence to support your evaluation, recommendations, and plans. Review the Nursing Master’s Program (MSN) Library Guide for guidance.

•            APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style. Review the Evidence and APA section of the Writing Center for guidance.

 

COMPETENCIES MEASURED:

 

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

•            Competency 2: Plan quality improvement initiatives in response to routine data surveillance.

◦          Analyze data to identify a health care issue or area of concern as it relates to a state, national, or accreditation benchmark requirement.

◦          Outline a quality improvement initiative proposal based on a selected health care issue or area of concern and supporting data analysis to improve identified dashboard metrics.

•            Competency 4: Integrate interprofessional perspectives to lead quality improvements in patient safety, cost-effectiveness, and work-life quality.

◦          Integrate interprofessional perspectives and specify actions to lead quality improvements in patient safety, cost-effectiveness, and work-life quality.

•            Competency 5: Apply effective communication strategies to promote quality improvement of interprofessional care.

◦          Apply effective collaboration strategies to promote quality improvement of interprofessional care.

◦          Create a persuasive, coherent, and effective audiovisual presentation. Integrate relevant sources to support arguments, correctly formatting citations and references using current APA style.

Reference

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2021). Preventing falls in hospitals. https://www.ahrq.gov/patient-safety/settings/hospital/fall-prevention/toolkit/index.html

ASSIGNMENT 2

Prepare an evaluation (5 pages) of an existing QI initiative to determine if the initiative is effective.

Introduction:

Too often, discussions about quality health care, care costs, and outcome measures take place in isolation—various groups talking among themselves about results and enhancements. Nurses are critical to the delivery of high-quality, efficient health care. As a result, they must develop their skills in reviewing and evaluating performance reports. They also need to be able to communicate outcome measures related to quality initiatives effectively. Patient safety and positive institutional health care outcomes mandate collaboration among nursing staff members to ensure the integration of their perspectives in all quality care initiatives.

Overview:

In the first assessment, you analyzed an adverse event or a near miss, and outlined a QI initiative to address it. This assessment will give you practice and the confidence to evaluate a quality care initiative in much the same way you might in your health care setting to help determine if the initiative is effective.

Too often, discussions about quality health care, care costs, and outcome measures take place in isolation—each group talking among themselves about results and enhancements. Because nurses are critical to the delivery of high-quality, efficient health care, it is essential that they develop the proficiency to review, evaluate performance reports, and be able to effectively communicate outcome measures related to quality initiatives. The nursing staff’s perspective and the need to collaborate on quality care initiatives are fundamental to patient safety and positive institutional health care outcomes.

INSTRUCTIONS:

Imagine you have been asked to prepare and deliver an analysis of an existing QI initiative at your workplace. The QI initiative you choose to analyze should be related to a specific disease, condition, or public health issue of personal or professional interest to you. The purpose of the report is to assess whether the specific quality indicators point to improved patient safety, quality of care, cost and efficiency goals, and other desired metrics. Your target audience is nurses and other health professionals with specializations or interest in your chosen condition, disease, or public health issue.

In your report, you will:

•            Analyze a current QI initiative in a health care setting.

◦          Identify what prompted implementation of the QI initiative.

◦          Evaluate problems that arose during the initiative or problems that were not addressed.

•            Evaluate the success of a current QI initiative through recognized benchmarks and outcome measures as required to meet national, state, or accreditation requirements.

◦          Identify the core performance measurements related to successful treatment or management of the condition.

◦          Evaluate the impact of the quality indicators on the health care facility.

•            Incorporate interprofessional perspectives related to the success of actions used in the QI initiative as they relate to functionality and outcomes.

•            Recommend additional indicators and protocols to improve and expand outcomes of a current quality initiative.

•            Ensure your analysis conveys purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards.

Be sure to address all of the bullet points. You may also want to read the Quality Improvement Initiative Evaluation Scoring Guide to better understand the performance levels that relate to each grading criterion. Additionally, be sure to review the Guiding Questions: Quality Improvement Initiative Evaluation [DOCX] document and Vila Health: Data Analysis for additional clarification about things to consider when creating your assessment.

 

ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS:

Your assessment should also meet the following requirements:

•            Length of submission: A minimum of five but no more than seven double-spaced, typed pages, not including the title page and References section.

•            Number of references: Cite a minimum of four sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your evaluation, recommendations, and plans. Current source material is defined as no older than five years unless it is a seminal work. Review the Nursing Master’s Program (MSN) Library Guide for guidance.

•            APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style. Review the Evidence and APA section of the Writing Center for guidance.

 

COMPETENCIES MEASURED:

 

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

•            Competency 2: Plan quality improvement initiatives in response to routine data surveillance.

◦          Recommend additional indicators and protocols to improve and expand outcomes of a quality initiative.

•            Competency 3: Evaluate quality improvement initiatives using sensitive and sound outcome measures.

◦          Analyze a current quality improvement initiative in a health care setting.

◦          Evaluate the success of a current quality improvement initiative through recognized benchmarks and outcome measures as required to meet national, state, or accreditation requirements.

•            Competency 4: Integrate interprofessional perspectives to lead quality improvements in patient safety, cost effectiveness, and work life quality.

◦          Incorporate interprofessional perspectives related to the success of actions utilized in a quality improvement initiative as they relate to functionality and outcomes.

•            Competency 5: Apply effective communication strategies to promote quality improvement of interprofessional care.

◦          Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards.

ASSIGNMENT 1

Prepare an analysis (5 pages) of an adverse event or a near miss from your professional nursing experience and outline a QI initiative that would address it.

Introduction:

Health care organizations strive to create a culture of safety. Despite technological advances, quality care initiatives, oversight, ongoing education and training, legislation, and regulations, medical errors continue to be made. Some are small and easily remedied with the patient unaware of the infraction. Others can be catastrophic and irreversible, altering the lives of patients and their caregivers and unleashing massive reforms and costly litigation. Many errors are attributable to ineffective interprofessional communication.

Overview:

The goal of this assessment is to allow you to focus on a specific event in a health care setting that impacts patient safety and related organizational vulnerabilities and to propose a QI initiative to prevent future incidents. It will give you the chance to develop your analytical skills in the problem-solving contexts you likely find yourself in as a health care professional.

Health care organizations strive for a culture of safety. Yet, despite technological advances, quality care initiatives, oversight, ongoing education and training, laws, legislation, and regulations, medical errors continue to occur. Some are small and easily remedied with the patient unaware of the infraction. Others can be catastrophic and irreversible, altering the lives of patients and their caregivers and unleashing massive reforms and costly litigation.

Historically, medical errors were reported and analyzed in hindsight. Today, QI initiatives attempt to be proactive, which contributes to the amount of attention paid to adverse events and near misses. Backed up by new technologies and reporting metrics, adverse events and near misses can provide insight into potential ways to improve care delivery and ensure patient safety.

For clarification, the National Quality Forum (n.d.) defines the following:

•            Adverse event: An event that results in unintended harm to the patient by an act of commission or omission rather than by the underlying disease or condition of the patient.

•            Near miss: An event or a situation that did not produce patient harm, but only because of intervening factors, such as patient health or timely intervention.

 

INSTRUCTIONS:

Prepare a comprehensive analysis of an adverse event or a near miss from your professional nursing experience that you or a peer experienced. Provide an analysis of the impact of the same type of adverse event or near miss in other facilities. How was it managed, who was involved, and how was it resolved? Be sure to:

•            Analyze the implications of the adverse event or near miss for all stakeholders.

•            Analyze the sequence of events, missed steps, or protocol deviations related to the adverse event or near miss using a root cause analysis.

•            Evaluate QI actions or technologies related to the event that are required to reduce risk and increase patient safety.

◦          Evaluate how other institutions integrated solutions to prevent these types of events.

◦          Incorporate relevant metrics of the adverse event or near miss to support need for improvement.

•            Outline a QI initiative to prevent a future adverse event or near miss.

•            Ensure your analysis conveys purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards.

Be sure your analysis addresses all of the above points. You may also want to read the Adverse Event or Near Miss Analysis Scoring Guide to better understand the performance levels that relate to each grading criterion. Additionally, be sure to review the Guiding Questions: Adverse Event or Near Miss Analysis [DOCX] document for additional clarification about things to consider when creating your assessment.

 

ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS:

Your assessment should also meet the following requirements:

•            Length of submission: A minimum of five but no more than seven double-spaced, typed pages, not including the title page or References section.

•            Number of references: Cite a minimum of three sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your evaluation, recommendations, and plans. Current source material is defined as no older than five years unless it is a seminal work. Review the Nursing Master’s Program (MSN) Library Guide for guidance.

•            APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style. Review the Evidence and APA section of the Writing Center for guidance.

 

COMPETENCIES MEASURED:

 

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:

•            Competency 1: Plan quality improvement initiatives in response to adverse events and near-miss analyses.

◦          Analyze the implications of an adverse event or a near miss for all stakeholders.

◦          Analyze the sequence of events, missed steps, or protocol deviations related to an adverse event or a near miss using a root cause analysis.

◦          Outline a quality improvement initiative to prevent a future adverse event or near miss based on research and evidence-based practices.

•            Competency 3: Evaluate quality improvement initiatives using sensitive and sound outcome measures.

◦          Evaluate and identify quality improvement actions or technologies related to an event that are required to reduce risk and increase patient safety.

•            Competency 5: Apply effective communication strategies to promote quality improvement of interprofessional care.

◦          Convey purpose, in an appropriate tone and style, incorporating supporting evidence and adhering to organizational, professional, and scholarly writing standards.